Blown To Bits

Fingerprints on the memo

Saturday, May 31st, 2008 by Harry Lewis
This amikacin cheap can include close family members and friends or others with cheap ampicillin from usa PsA who can understand feelings of embarrassment. They can help buy free amikacin prescription you determine whether the benefits you may get from this cialis cheap drug treatment will outweigh its possible risks. People can also care viagra for their hands at home by protecting the skin from purchase generic erythromycin prescription delivery triggers, avoiding harsh products, and moisturizing regularly. However, researchers think buy cheap levitra online that issues with a person's central nervous system, which comprises cheapest alesse (ovral l) the brain and spinal cord, may be responsible. The choice order viagra from canada between Citrucel and Metamucil depends on specific digestive needs and levitra online pharmacy individual fiber tolerance levels. To treat plaque psoriasis in adults, buy griseofulvin online you should apply a thin layer of Zoryve cream to (ovral overdose online purchase free the psoriasis plaques once per day. A doctor may be lasix us able to treat them with antibiotics, or they will go away.

Metadata is data about your data. A filename is the simplest kind of metadata; it is data that goes with the file but is different from the data in the file itself. Depending on the software you are using, a file’s metadata might include the time it was created and last modified, the registered name of the owner of the computer on which it was created, the name of some other file from which this file was derived, and the name of the software that was used to create it.

A file’s metadata can be revealing once the file gets into circulation. If you are organizing your sister’s birthday party and you send her the RSVP list, forgetting that you named the file “my_stupid_sisters_stupid_party.doc,” sis may draw some inferences from the metadata beyond what she learns from the file itself about who is coming.

In Chapter 3 of Blown to Bits we give some embarrassing examples of this kind. But today’s news brings us a whopper. The foolish computer user in this case user seems not to be some hapless birthday-giving brother, but Google. Talk about people who should know better!

The story is set in Australia, where Ebay is planning to shift its payment system to Paypal only, eliminating the credit and debit card option. Ebay owns Paypal, and in Australia, this sort of thing requires public comment. Among the comments received was an anonymous 38-page document, giving all the reasons why Ebay should not be allowed to do this — it would be anticompetitive, etc., etc.

Anonymous, but perhaps not too anonymous. The document was a PDF, but the “Title” property was “Microsoft Word – 204481916_1_ACCC Submission by Google re eBay Public _2_.DOC.” (If you use Acrobat Reader to open a PDF document, then use the “Properties” menu item, you may be able to find this kind of information as part of the “Description.”) I wonder if someone at Google would really use Microsoft Word or put “Google” into the filename. But even if not, the document could still be Google’s — it might have been written by an outside counsel, or consultant, or summer intern even.

Google seems neither to be confirming nor denying that it is the source of the anonymous document. Theoretically, it could be a third party trying to embarrass Google. And¬†Google isn’t currently competing for the Paypal market in Australia. But it does make you wonder if Google is venturing a bit beyond its “You can make money without doing evil” philosophy.

For the whole story, and links to the document itself, check out this item on TechCrunch.

Comments are closed.