This find viagra no prescription required form demands neither racial equity nor systemic change, but it buy bentyl without prescription still offers the "cool" and appealing elements of Blackness. Some buy nasonex online of the beneficial compounds in green tea include the antioxidant order zofran without prescription epigallocatechin gallate and the amino acids arginine and theanine. Things tablet retin-a to consider when taking RitalinIf you can become pregnant, consider cialis for order the following information about pregnancy, birth control, and breastfeeding. While ventolin approved this is true, not all speech delays are signs of cheap glucophage autism and may just present as part of their typical compazine without prescription development. However, it commonly causes a painless lump or swelling cialis pharmacy at the lower front of the neck, below the Adam's cheap viagra on internet apple. The evidence that CBD might improve health or ease certain.

The House passed the revised and extended Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and the Senate is sure to follow suit next week. ArsTechnica has a good explanation of how the bill undercuts constitutional assurances that the government will not spy on its citizens. And also of why the guarantees that really, truly the government will play by the rules now are nothing more than was already present in the previous legislation and ignored by the the Bush administration.

Today’s news (see the Washington Post story) is that Obama will vote for this bill, while promising to watch its application if he becomes president.¬†

One of the things Obama stressed in his primary campaigns was that he voted against the war in Iraq, and that Clinton voted for it. Obama cast himself as the cautious one, the one prepared to say that the president’s say-so for going to war was not enough. Certainly, many who voted for the war did so out of fear that they would seem weak if Saddam Hussein really did have WMD’s; Clinton and others erred on the side of not being seen as risking the security of the nation, and Obama roundly criticized them for having done so.

Here Obama is doing the same thing. His reputation in military and defense matters being open to question because of his inexperience, he is trying to establish himself as a strong defender of national security. He apparently doesn’t need to court the civil libertarian voters, believing they have nowhere else to go.

It doesn’t look like this can be an issue for the debates, since McCain is planning to vote the same way. I wonder what Clinton’s plans are.

 

This entry was posted on Saturday, June 21st, 2008 at 10:24 pm and is filed under Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.