Some buy cheap zoloft people with osteochondritis dissecans injuries may find it difficult to buy cialis lowest price treat certain areas with exercise. Acupuncture involves stimulating specific points discount lasix according to "qi" — an energy that flows through meridians discount azor in the body, according to TCM. Clinical research also shows buy celexa no prescription required that acupuncture can enhance bone mineral density in people with buy gentamicin eye drops postmenopausal osteoporosis. They believe the method may help activate and augmentin low price regulate specific signaling pathways in the body, allowing cells to cialis rx communicate with each other. The process is not typically painful, atarax although a person may experience a dull ache or tingling canadian cialis sensation. Current research suggests osteoporosis may be beneficial for osteoporosis, although.

The House passed the revised and extended Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and the Senate is sure to follow suit next week. ArsTechnica has a good explanation of how the bill undercuts constitutional assurances that the government will not spy on its citizens. And also of why the guarantees that really, truly the government will play by the rules now are nothing more than was already present in the previous legislation and ignored by the the Bush administration.

Today’s news (see the Washington Post story) is that Obama will vote for this bill, while promising to watch its application if he becomes president.¬†

One of the things Obama stressed in his primary campaigns was that he voted against the war in Iraq, and that Clinton voted for it. Obama cast himself as the cautious one, the one prepared to say that the president’s say-so for going to war was not enough. Certainly, many who voted for the war did so out of fear that they would seem weak if Saddam Hussein really did have WMD’s; Clinton and others erred on the side of not being seen as risking the security of the nation, and Obama roundly criticized them for having done so.

Here Obama is doing the same thing. His reputation in military and defense matters being open to question because of his inexperience, he is trying to establish himself as a strong defender of national security. He apparently doesn’t need to court the civil libertarian voters, believing they have nowhere else to go.

It doesn’t look like this can be an issue for the debates, since McCain is planning to vote the same way. I wonder what Clinton’s plans are.

 

This entry was posted on Saturday, June 21st, 2008 at 10:24 pm and is filed under Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.