Blown To Bits

FISA: Obama’s Iraq-War Vote?

Saturday, June 21st, 2008 by Harry Lewis
DMMPs buy cheap t-ject 60 are helpful, because diabetes is a challenging, long-term condition, and buy atenolol it often requires a person to change their diet, lifestyle, flovent prescription and daily routines. Healthcare professionals ensure that individuals have the buy internet necessary knowledge and capabilities to complete the steps in their buy online low cheap price plan. The section will list the type of glucose meter cialis professional a person uses and the target blood glucose level before find cheap for meals. Before attending an appointment with a doctor or nurse glucophage internet to discuss a care plan, a person may wish to purchase cheap dexamethasone without prescription india have a set of questions ready to ask. During a buy medication diabetes management appointment, it is also crucial for individuals to discount methotrexate overnight delivery tell their doctor if they have noticed any new symptoms, especially.

The House passed the revised and extended Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and the Senate is sure to follow suit next week. ArsTechnica has a good explanation of how the bill undercuts constitutional assurances that the government will not spy on its citizens. And also of why the guarantees that really, truly the government will play by the rules now are nothing more than was already present in the previous legislation and ignored by the the Bush administration.

Today’s news (see the Washington Post story) is that Obama will vote for this bill, while promising to watch its application if he becomes president.¬†

One of the things Obama stressed in his primary campaigns was that he voted against the war in Iraq, and that Clinton voted for it. Obama cast himself as the cautious one, the one prepared to say that the president’s say-so for going to war was not enough. Certainly, many who voted for the war did so out of fear that they would seem weak if Saddam Hussein really did have WMD’s; Clinton and others erred on the side of not being seen as risking the security of the nation, and Obama roundly criticized them for having done so.

Here Obama is doing the same thing. His reputation in military and defense matters being open to question because of his inexperience, he is trying to establish himself as a strong defender of national security. He apparently doesn’t need to court the civil libertarian voters, believing they have nowhere else to go.

It doesn’t look like this can be an issue for the debates, since McCain is planning to vote the same way. I wonder what Clinton’s plans are.

 

3 Responses to “FISA: Obama’s Iraq-War Vote?”

  1. xoites Says:

    Repeal FISA is up and running. Anyone who wants to is welcome to sign up and become a Poster on it. The purpose of the blog is to organize a drive to repeal the FISA laws and all laws that pardon or give immunity from prosecution anyone who has violated the Constitution during the Bush Administration.

    That is why we want everyone to be able to Post so they can start a conversation about an idea they have to make this happen.

    Stop on by and check it out. By all means leave a comment and sign up to blog with us as we figure out what needs to be done to return our Fourth Amendment Rights and our rule of law.

    If you have a blog already and you become a poster we will link to your site.

    http://repealfisa.wordpress.com/

  2. Blown to Bits » Blog Archive » Alert: Political Contributions Buy Votes Says:

    […] FISA: Obama’s Iraq-War Vote? […]

  3. Blown to Bits » Blog Archive » Live by the social network, die by the social network Says:

    […] the Obama Facebook group to organize opposition to the senator’s position on FISA (previously discussed on this blog). It’s a lovely example of the double-edged sword. Conventional wisdom requires that modern […]