There buy diclofenac online may sometimes be warning signs, such as changes in voice synthroid online and facial expressions, when a person with dementia becomes angry. buy viagra generic These symptoms may make a person with dementia feel embarrassed, nexium no prescription frustrated, and patronized, causing them to react with meanness and levitra without prescription anger. According to the Alzheimer's Association, many people with dementia cialis discount function better in the mornings and are more alert at glucophage online certain times. Below are several tips from the Alzheimer's Association order lipitor to help caregivers respond to angry outbursts and changing behaviors. cheap discount in usa If they try to attack physically, a person should avoid bentyl online stores physical contact and never react to the violence with force. buy discount viagra Anger and aggressive behavior belong to a group of symptoms cheapest cheap price that doctors call behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Holding buy cheap atarax online complex and lengthy discussions with a person with the condition buying cheap buy side effects canada may only trigger frustration or anger. Dementia symptoms, such as hallucinations,.

On pages 247-249 of Blown to Bits, we tell the saga of the Child Online Protection Act, an act criminalizing the posting to a web site “material that is harmful to minors.” The law was protested for a host of reasons, among them that it’s hard to tell how old the viewers of your web site actually are. It never took effect, and we say in the book, “in March 2007, the ax finally fell on COPA.”

We spoke too soon. The ax referred to there was the decision of a federal district court in eastern Pennsylvania that the law was unconstitutional, but the government appealed that decision. Yesterday the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the district court (opinion here): the law goes too far in restricting speech. In particular, harmful material is better kept from minors at the destination, by use of filters in the home, rather than at the source, by criminalizing the publication.

But even now, ten years after the law was passed, it may not be dead. The government may appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping that the third time’s a charm.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008 at 7:17 pm and is filed under The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.