They cheap zofran from uk took these findings as evidence that long-term use of NSAIDs pyrantel pamoate online is safe for people living with AS. For example, most cheap viagra no rx PMHNs tend to explore environmental factors that influence mental health buy discount viagra online and help people develop stronger interpersonal relationships, rather than providing celebrex without prescription treatment using medication or psychotherapy. Due to the way biologic xalatan for order drugs are made, it's not possible to make exact copies buy generic cialis no prescription usa of brand-name biologics. People also need to speak with a dangers cheapest lasix get healthcare professional if they have concerns about cerumen impaction. As quinine online pharmacy time goes on, changes can happen in a person's genes buy cheap allopurinol that change the way cells grow and divide normally. Autopsies azor prescription of brain tissue have revealed that CJD leads to certain purchase free betnovate low price australia changes that do not occur with other causes of dementia. canadian pharmacy nexium According to the American Psychological Association, a cognitive distortion is an.

The worlds of copyright and privacy collided on Tuesday to cause a massive, privacy-shattering digital explosion. A judge ordered Google, which owns YouTube, to turn over to Viacom all its records of who has watched what videos. What clip, under what name, and from what IP address. Viacom is suing Google for accommodating its copyrighted materials on YouTube, and the judge dismissed privacy arguments Google tried to mount as “speculative.” The story is here and the judge’s order is here. (Thanks to Wired’s blog for these.)

Readers of Blown to Bits will recall how easily “anonymized” search records were de-identified, so there is serious reason to doubt that the fact that YouTube users are free to choose non-identifying login names will really protect their privacy.

The logs themselves comprise twelve TERABYTEs of data. There are lots of things that can be done with that data and there are lots of ways it can go astray ….

The judge denied various other requests of the plaintiffs, including a request for the source code of the Google search engine itself, supposedly so the plaintiff could check if Google was doing something special to make infringing material more attractive.

But the judge did require Google to turn over every video it has ever taken down for any reason, so Viacom can sort through them and draw their own conclusions about why. So if you ever put up a video while you were drunk and then changed your mind in the cold light of day, it’s part of the evidence in this court case now.

So much for the illusion that watching YouTube is like watching TV. But I’m sure there’s no reason to be worried about all those activity logs. Surely everyone will understand that you were just horsing around when you were watching that stuff ‚Ķ or maybe you were conducting research, yes, that’s what you were doing ‚Ķ.

This entry was posted on Thursday, July 3rd, 2008 at 1:35 pm and is filed under Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.