In griseofulvin without prescription some cases, such as if the drug's effects are wearing retin-a online stores off too quickly, your doctor may recommend taking Rytary more synthroid price than three times per day. When Viagra's patent expired, other buy petcam (metacam) oral suspension online companies could sell a generic version of the drug — discount cialis without prescription sildenafil — for significantly lower prices. To help make sure generic zoloft that you don't miss an appointment for your dose of cialis online without prescription Monjuvi, try using a medication reminder. This immune-mediated process leads purchase xalatan online to chronic inflammation, joint pain, swelling, stiffness, and potential joint spiriva online review damage over time. Most healthcare teams should have a pre-surgery order diflucan low price drugs consultation to review medications, what to expect, recovery, and additional atenolol information. This was especially true with patients who underwent meningioma spiriva sale and neuroblastoma surgery and lowest in patients treated for metastatic tumors..

The worlds of copyright and privacy collided on Tuesday to cause a massive, privacy-shattering digital explosion. A judge ordered Google, which owns YouTube, to turn over to Viacom all its records of who has watched what videos. What clip, under what name, and from what IP address. Viacom is suing Google for accommodating its copyrighted materials on YouTube, and the judge dismissed privacy arguments Google tried to mount as “speculative.” The story is here and the judge’s order is here. (Thanks to Wired’s blog for these.)

Readers of Blown to Bits will recall how easily “anonymized” search records were de-identified, so there is serious reason to doubt that the fact that YouTube users are free to choose non-identifying login names will really protect their privacy.

The logs themselves comprise twelve TERABYTEs of data. There are lots of things that can be done with that data and there are lots of ways it can go astray ….

The judge denied various other requests of the plaintiffs, including a request for the source code of the Google search engine itself, supposedly so the plaintiff could check if Google was doing something special to make infringing material more attractive.

But the judge did require Google to turn over every video it has ever taken down for any reason, so Viacom can sort through them and draw their own conclusions about why. So if you ever put up a video while you were drunk and then changed your mind in the cold light of day, it’s part of the evidence in this court case now.

So much for the illusion that watching YouTube is like watching TV. But I’m sure there’s no reason to be worried about all those activity logs. Surely everyone will understand that you were just horsing around when you were watching that stuff ‚Ķ or maybe you were conducting research, yes, that’s what you were doing ‚Ķ.

This entry was posted on Thursday, July 3rd, 2008 at 1:35 pm and is filed under Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.