The cipro overnight shipping choice between gastric sleeve and gastric bypass surgery depends on buy viagra internet individual factors, including a person's health status and preferences and purchase free augmentin low price australia discussions with a medical team. An upper endoscopy is a best price quinine procedure that helps doctors examine the esophagus, stomach, and the purchase synthroid first section of the small intestine. A search effort found cheap cialis from uk her in a hotel in the north of England over pamoate online review a week later, staying under a false name. Dosage to lipitor no prescription prevent pregnancyMirena is approved to help prevent pregnancy in adolescents order viagra overnight delivery who can become pregnant. If a person is not aware glucophage rx of their loved one's illness, they may think their loved purchase petcam (metacam) oral suspension online one is lying to them. For example, the training standards for.

Last April (see MSN Music RIP) I blogged about Microsoft’s decision to shut down the license servers for MSN Music at the end of August, thereby stranding customers who had purchased music tracks governed by MSN Music’s Digital Rights Management. As it turned out, Microsoft reconsidered, and now says that the license servers will operate until at least 2011.

Now Yahoo has joined the DRM customer stranding game with its July 23rd announcement that it will shut down the Yahoo Music Store servers at the end of September. The result will be that anyone who purchased Music Store tracks will be unable to move them to new machines after the deadline. As with Microsoft’s (since retracted) announcement, this is another demonstration that customers don’t really own the music they “purchase” under DRM systems. Instead, they remain dependent on the distributor’s willingness to keep the DRM license servers running: something for which the distributor has given no long-term guarantee.

As Blown to Bits argues, DRM is a bad deal for customers and a bad deal for innovation. It’s also a bad deal for the music distributors themselves, since it obligates them to maintain an ongoing technical infrastructure of license servers. It’s encouraging to see the continuted growth of non-DRM alternatives for music distribution. Now if only Congress would figure out what a bill of goods they’ve been sold by DRM pushers.

This entry was posted on Saturday, July 26th, 2008 at 11:53 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.