A advair no prescription lack of awareness about the differences in heart attack symptoms get prescription alternatives store between men and women also leads to higher rates of pyrantel pamoate for order misdiagnosis, which can be fatal. It leads to worsened outcomes buy nasonex online not just for the people it directly affects, but also discount celebrex for those with more power and resources. To establish that buy cheapest buy no prescription the product manufacturers addressed safety and efficacy standards, we:.We do cheap online cheap the research so you can find trusted products for your purchase buy online health and wellness.Read more about our vetting process. Hospital bed online discount mattress manufacturers use different materials in their products than regular low cost for mattress manufacturers. One study demonstrated that a large-scale switch-out of order arcoxia no rx hospital mattresses led to a reduction in hospital-acquired pressure sores. tizanidine People who have pressure sores or are at risk of developing.

Last April (see MSN Music RIP) I blogged about Microsoft’s decision to shut down the license servers for MSN Music at the end of August, thereby stranding customers who had purchased music tracks governed by MSN Music’s Digital Rights Management. As it turned out, Microsoft reconsidered, and now says that the license servers will operate until at least 2011.

Now Yahoo has joined the DRM customer stranding game with its July 23rd announcement that it will shut down the Yahoo Music Store servers at the end of September. The result will be that anyone who purchased Music Store tracks will be unable to move them to new machines after the deadline. As with Microsoft’s (since retracted) announcement, this is another demonstration that customers don’t really own the music they “purchase” under DRM systems. Instead, they remain dependent on the distributor’s willingness to keep the DRM license servers running: something for which the distributor has given no long-term guarantee.

As Blown to Bits argues, DRM is a bad deal for customers and a bad deal for innovation. It’s also a bad deal for the music distributors themselves, since it obligates them to maintain an ongoing technical infrastructure of license servers. It’s encouraging to see the continuted growth of non-DRM alternatives for music distribution. Now if only Congress would figure out what a bill of goods they’ve been sold by DRM pushers.

This entry was posted on Saturday, July 26th, 2008 at 11:53 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.