However, compare viagra prices online this article should not be used as a substitute for buying cheapest gel effects the knowledge and expertise of a licensed healthcare professional. Sleeping tizanidine in us in the fetal position or on the left side may cheapest gentamicin eye drops improve sleep quality and provide relief from indigestion and heartburn. buy cheap glyburide online However, if a person experiences poor sleep or has a buy azor without prescription condition associated with nocturnal high blood pressure, a doctor may synthroid price wish to check their blood pressure levels. You'll typically inject cheapest generic glucophage Cyltezo every other week, but this depends on the condition discount tizanidine you're treating. What you can doIf you experience frequent or accutane cheap bothersome sleep paralysis while taking Quviviq, let your doctor know. cheap triamterene Septic arthritis, in particular, may cause severe complications if a cheapest clozapine person does not receive treatment. A doctor will also schedule discount atarax a follow-up phone call or in-office appointment to discuss the buying cheapest viagra effects liver biopsy results. People with fast-growing cancers may need higher doses.

Off at my summer home on a mountain lake, I am trying to read about anything but bits. So I’ve read two good books — Susan Jacoby’s Freethinkers and Jules Tygiel’s Past Time. A history of secularism in America and a history of baseball. Unaccountably, each has a paragraph about the social consequences of improvements in communication technology. And the two paragraphs make closely related points. And the same issues are with us today, and relevant to the debates about whether the Internet can be a democratizing technology, what influence private carriers have over public understanding of the truth, and whether the unlimited availability of information will mean that we will in the end become more isolated through our ability to pick and choose the reality we wish to believe.

Jacoby discusses the influence of early radio on the secularism movement.

The farmers who rode fifty miles across the prairie to hear [famous agnostic orator Robert] Ingersoll in the 1890s were likely to be found in their own living rooms, listening to their own radios, in the 1920s — and radio sponsors did not spend their money to ¬†promote attacks on the God of the Bible. Freethought ideals did survive the disappearance of the freethought movement, but — unlike religious evangelism — they were ill suited, because of their emphasis on facts rather than emotions, to the new mass communications media. (p. 263)

Tygiel talks about how radio spelled the end of public scoreboards in cities, where crowds used to gather to see the telegraphed play-by-play of baseball games posted for public view.

The radio had, in a very important sense, democratized major league baseball, transmitting a more intimate sense of being at the game to millions who could never attend. Yet the process had become more familial or individualistic, replacing the communal experience with a more isolated one. Radio made baseball, more than ever, a national sport, but in a context far removed from earlier meanings of that term. (p. 73)

One of the big points of our book is that the digital explosion is not inevitably either good or bad. More capacity to communicate information does not automatically lead to greater enlightenment and greater democratic empowerment. The future depends on who has the power to control the communication media and how they use it. It’s important for us all to realize that nothing is inevitable — we need to understand, and to watch, what may seem to be struggles over obscure technical points, because the way the future will look may depend on choices being made today.

This entry was posted on Monday, August 18th, 2008 at 12:26 am and is filed under Radio and television. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.