However, acomplia no prescription as with any vaccine, it is possible for people to cialis prices experience side effects or adverse reactions. I let him open cheap zoloft pill a few doors to see what was inside the rooms generic amikacin that were full of hurt for me, and he didn't buy acomplia online run. A tattoo creates an open wound in the skin buy discount celexa sale jelly that has the potential to become infected, particularly if sterilized get prozac alternatives store equipment is not used or if the appropriate tattoo aftercare buy cheap retin-a online is not followed. Metabolic activity involves both creating tissues while buy cialis from canada storing energy, and destroying tissues while using up energy. Mindfulness buy amikacin in us is a form of meditation that involves someone focusing on no rx tetracycline how they are feeling in the present moment. If you buy flovent generic need financial support to pay for bicalutamide, consider looking into tetracycline online websites that offer cost resources and information. If a doctor buy cheapest betnovate no prescription discovers that a person has unusual moles or skin changes during.

I wrote last week about Yahoo’s shutdown of its Music Store Server, thereby stranding customers who had bought music controlled by the Music Store’s digital rights management. This week, Yahoo announced that it will compensate stranded customers with coupons for replacing music tacks from Real Network’s Rhapsody, whose music is free of DRM copying restrictions.

It’s good to see Yahoo showing concern for its customers, and even better to see them offering higher-value, i.e. non-DRM, replacements. As recently as February 2007, Warner Music’s CEO was deriding the idea of non-DRM music as “completely without logic or merit.” Now DRM-free is becoming the norm for on-line music, with the growing realization that DRM is bad deal for music, not only for customers but for publishers, and also, as explained in Blown to Bits, for innovation. I expect that we’ll see the same shift in attitudes toward DRM-free video within a couple of years.

Yahoo was wise to quickly make amends to its customers, because there’s a lot more at stake for the IT industry than lost music tracks. The basic phenomenon of Yahoo’s (and earlier, Microsoft’s) announcement about shutting down DRM servers was that of leading high-tech companies offering a product that entailed a long-term commitment to maintaining a customer service, and then abandoning that commitment when the economics went sour.

What does that mean for the industry’s growing emphasis on cloud computing? After all, if you can’t count on Yahoo to keep your music available for five years, how can you count on Microsoft, Google, IBM, and others to keep your company email and documents available for … do you need to have confidence for 10 years? 20? 50? I’d be viewing these server shutdowns nervously if I were a corporate CIO faced with the option of moving to cloud computing. And I’d be thinking hard about them if I were high-tech exec eager to get into the cloud business. After all, maintaining “long term” DRM servers seemed like a great business opportunity in 2004.

This entry was posted on Friday, August 1st, 2008 at 12:29 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.