Blown To Bits

The Internet Could Not Have Been Invented Today

Sunday, September 7th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Individuals purchase augmentin online should not discontinue medications for bipolar disorder or make other order no rx allopurinol changes to their therapy to use L-theanine supplements without consulting lumigan no prescription a healthcare professional. Some of these dietary changes may worsen buying cialis pancreatic cancer symptoms and even affect treatment efficacy. Anal fissures estrace vaginal cream prescription occur because of the stretching that happens when a person buy cheap zithromax strains due to constipation. However, some people may have certain buy generic clindamycin gel factors that can increase their risk of developing gestational diabetes. cheapest amoxicillin Seeking help for addiction may seem daunting or even scary, cheap nexium but several organizations can provide support. A ring-shaped rash may mirapex sale appear in people with petaloid seborrheic dermatitis, a severe form buy free cialis no prescription dosage of the condition. It could be the result of factors discount erythromycin like untreated health problems, accidental trauma, suicide, or homicide. Dermal order lumigan low price drugs fillers can help fill lines and wrinkles with collagen and hyaluronic.

If you want to know why not, read “When Academia Puts Profit Ahead of Wonder,” an opinion piece in today’s New York Times. It’s about the unforeseen consequences of the Bayh-Dole act, which was meant to provide a profit motive to universities, to encourage them to transfer their scientific and technological discoveries to private enterprise as quickly as possible. As a result, the spirit of science and applied science has changed. One of the first thing that happens to students today is that they are informed that the university has rights to inventions and discoveries that come about as part of sponsored research. When I wrote some math software in 1968 that enabled users to write equations in ordinary 2-D notation and to see the graphs of those equations on a screen, I don’t think I had even heard the word “patent.” It was just not part of the vocabulary — certainly not the university’s possible interest.

If the Internet protocols were developed in a university setting today, the university would almost have to patent them and then give a single private company a long-term exclusive license to use them. The Internet would not be common property, and research at other universities would be restricted by the legal requirement that they negotiate use of the patent rights.

It’s a new world, and not a better one. Jennifer Washburn’s book, University, Inc., which is mentioned in the article, is also excellent, even though it’s a few years old now.

Comments are closed.