Blown To Bits

Strange Bedfellows Department

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Pelvic tizanidine online floor exercises, such as Kegel exercises, pelvic floor electrical stimulation, buy cheap glucophage and vaginal weight training, can also help reduce the symptoms buy azor from canada of an overactive bladder. However, with appropriate interventions, people can order clindamycin gel learn to manage their symptoms and improve their quality of canadian viagra life. Medications, such as enzyme preparations or dissolving agents, may mirapex sale help break down specific components of the bezoar. SHOP NOW buy generic glucophage AT CBDMD FABCBD included camphor oil and menthol crystals to diovan online stores create a salve with a heating and cooling effect. Winter cheap celebrex on internet and late summer or early fall can offer some relief, buy accutane no prescription required with reduced levels of certain allergens. Legal authorities can order lumigan online stores autopsies as part of a police investigation or for the purposes.

John McCain yesterday joined Larry Lessig and other critics of strong copyright protections — if not on the general principles, at least on the way they apply to his campaign.

McCain’s campaign sent a letter (PDF here) to YouTube, making the following complaint:

Numerous times during the course of the campaign, our advertisements or web videos have been the subject of DMCA takedown notices regarding uses that are clearly privileged under the fair use doctrine.

Apparently YouTube has received complaints from the TV networks about use within McCain’s political ads of clips of a few seconds from news shows. The letter goes on to propose that YouTube use a different protocol before responding to these takedown notices.

The problem is that, much as we all might prefer YouTube to resist poorly founded copyright infringement claims, they would be crazy to do so. The reason is that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act gives them a “safe harbor” from prosecution if they take the offending clip down immediately, and let the party who put it up file a counterclaim. Why would the YouTube folks risk prosecution, when they can let CBS and the McCain campaign fight it out at no risk to themselves?

Well, perhaps because YouTube is owned by Google, whose mission is “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.” But that is probably too much to hope for, when the real problem here is not YouTube’s behavior, but the way the law is written. The DMCA invites this kind of censorship, and in a political campaign, where days count, the time required for the claim-counterclaim protocol renders the arguing pointless.

So perhaps, instead of writing to YouTube, Senator McCain might update his Technology policy page, which now states:

While the Internet has provided tremendous opportunity for the creators of copyrighted works, including music and movies, to distribute their works around the world at low cost, it has also given rise to a global epidemic of piracy. John McCain supports efforts to crack down on piracy, both on the Internet and off.

Perhaps instead of pledging to strengthen the hands of the copyright holders, he might instead acknowledge that tools for cracking down have already gone too far.

One Response to “Strange Bedfellows Department”

  1. Blown to Bits » Blog Archive » Using Copyright to Censor Parody Says:

    […] infringing material while the parties sort out their dispute. The Yes Men have the same gripe that John McCain had when a TV network demanded that YouTube pull an ad because it contained a short clip of an evening […]