Open buy xalatan online communication about sleep-related fears or anxieties can help to develop buy cheap tizanidine online a supportive environment and reduce feelings of isolation. The muscle griseofulvin without rx changes that a person may experience during the early stages purchase cheapest serevent no prescription tablets of ALS can worsen during the middle stages of the order cheapest kenalog dose condition. However, a person should have their surgeon examine the clomid rx implants and check to make sure they have healed correctly, nexium in australia and that no new areas of concern have appeared. People order discount cialis online should stop using CBD if they experience side effects, including cheapest flovent a fast or irregular heartbeat. However, some people may find dangers cheapest cialis get they can benefit from exercising on a treadmill occasionally without clozapine for order any negative effect on how their knees feel. In order to.

Yesterday we blogged about the request by the McCain-Palin campaign that YouTube respond to takedown notices less automatically. YouTube has responded in the negative, stating (as I did) that the problem is the law, not YouTube’s manner of dealing with the opposing parties. Here is YouTube’s response; I find it pretty reasonable. The Electronic Frontier Foundation wishes YouTube would show a bit more willingness to ignore obviously spurious takedown notices, e.g. ones where the contested material is a few seconds of a news show.

An interesting question is whether political campaign ads should get some special treatment. McCain’s campaign argues that because of the time sensitivity of campaigns and the importance of the free flow of information to the electorate, there should be a higher standard for taking down a campaign ad. YouTube doesn’t agree. Neither does Chris Soghoian in a well-argued, passionate post: Stand in line, he tells McCain, along with all the other people who are being abused by inappropriate DMCA takedowns.

This entry was posted on Thursday, October 16th, 2008 at 7:19 am and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.