Treatment find no rx cialis for metastatic RCC varies depending on the size of the discount viagra primary tumor, the number of metastases, and the structure of purchase 60 overnight delivery the cancer tissue. Additionally, if someone with epilepsy experiences any drug zyprexa online purchase new symptoms, they should contact a doctor immediately. You can order cialis cheap online call your Medicare plan provider to learn whether your particular buy generic cialis cost professional plan covers the cost of Zoryve. In these cases, a kenalog buy person's doctor may recommend other treatments, such as chemotherapy, ablation, buy glucophage low price or radiation therapy. A person who cannot afford Medicare costs diflucan for sale may be eligible for the Qualified Medicare Beneficiary (QMB) Program. buy generic clomid problems Due to the rarity of complications associated with colonoscopies, it order remeron is possible for a doctor to misdiagnose a complication. While artane prescription it is uncertain if acupuncture consistently helps with OAB, it buy cheapest viagra does have several advantages that may make it a useful addition.

I’ve been writing about Internet censorship, not just in Blown to Bits but in the Boston Globe (The Dangers of Internet Censorship). In a fascinating piece entitled Blacklisted in Cyberspace, James McGrath Morris describes a form of censorship I hadn’t encountered, consciously at least.

Morris publishes a monthly newsletter about the craft of writing biographies. Hardly sexy stuff, you’d think.

He runs his copy through a spam-checking software tool, to see if the spam filters of his recipients’ email servers or personal computers are likely to discard the newsletter before it is even delivered. He was shocked to discover that his last issue had a spam score that was through the roof. Why? I’ll quote:

Three sets of words among the issue’s many articles could derail my e-mail: a reference to “young adult,” a common classification for books intended for adolescent readers; a sentence in my editorial — “Speaking of legal matters, it’s getting nasty out there” — referring to the growing number of lawsuits; and a distinguished biographer’s discussion of writing a book for children that included the following comment: “At my public library I queried the children’s division librarian — what works, what does not, who is ‘hot.'”¬†The inclusion of “young adult,” “getting nasty” and “hot” among the thousands of words in my publication was like poison.

What’s an author to do? “Write around” these everyday phrases to satisfy the demands of the spam-checking software? Perhaps — but if the next release of the software is even more censorious, where would it end?

This entry was posted on Sunday, November 30th, 2008 at 10:31 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.