The cheap glyburide most serious risk is a blood clot becoming loose and buy sale free pharmacy moving to the brain, where it can cause a stroke. cheapest generic cialis online A stroke occurs when something blocks the blood supply, and lasix prescription therefore, oxygen, from reaching part of the brain or when discount flovent a blood vessel in the brain bursts. Doctors will weigh diflucan online stores the risks of stroke against those of bleeding in each ventolin no prescription individual with AFib to determine the safest and most effective compare ampicillin prices online treatment for them. Another option is coil embolization or aneurysm buy generic dexamethasone side effects clipping to prevent blood from leaking from an aneurysm. According estradiol valerate for sale to the National Heart, Blood, and Lung Institute (NHLBI), arrhythmias buy generic cipro occur due to issues in the electrical signals within the buy generic amikacin heart, which helps control the rate of heartbeat. Side effectsCommon atenolol for sale side effects of beta-blockers are bradycardia and hypotension (low blood cheap atenolol no rx pressure). The blocking of potassium channels delays the repolarization of cells,.

Oncer again, in the name of protecting America’s children from exploitation, Congress is considering a massive increase in data collection about the activities of you, me, and everyone else. Specifically, the SAFETY Act (click for the full text) would require that

A provider of an electronic communication service or remote computing service shall retain for a period of at least two years all records or other information pertaining to the identity of a user of a temporarily assigned network address the service assigns to that user.

That means not just your Internet Service Provider at home, but Starbucks. And the beneficiaries would be not just police looking for pedophiles, but the recording industry looking for people who downloaded music in an airport lounge.

As we have said before (here and here, for example), the Internet threats to child safety have been mischaracterized and exaggerated, and spending resources on programs like this draws resources away from places where they are badly needed, helping troubled children from troubled families. Bills like this are transparent attempts to exploit the child safety issue to ramp up government data collection about innocent citizens, data that will be repurposed and abused once it has been collected. It’s the kind of Big-Brother surveillance proposed in the UK, as we discussed last fall.

Stop this madness. There is zero evidence that this is a sensible solution to the problem the bill claims to be aimed at, and it is an unconscionable invasion of our rights to privacy.

This entry was posted on Friday, February 20th, 2009 at 6:32 pm and is filed under Privacy, Surveillance. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.