<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Facebook Data Belongs to Facebook &#8212; Now and Forever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bitsbook.com/2009/02/your-facebook-data-belongs-to-facebook-now-and-forever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bitsbook.com/2009/02/your-facebook-data-belongs-to-facebook-now-and-forever/</link>
	<description>Your Life, Liberty and Happiness After the Digital Explosion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:55:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blown to Bits &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Facebook Getting Scammy</title>
		<link>http://www.bitsbook.com/2009/02/your-facebook-data-belongs-to-facebook-now-and-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>Blown to Bits &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Facebook Getting Scammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitsbook.com/?p=386#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>[...] Your Facebook Data Belongs to Facebook &#8212; Now and Forever  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Your Facebook Data Belongs to Facebook &#8212; Now and Forever  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.bitsbook.com/2009/02/your-facebook-data-belongs-to-facebook-now-and-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitsbook.com/?p=386#comment-1370</guid>
		<description>&gt;  And why would they be changing their policy now if they don‚Äôt anticipate doing exactly this in the future?

I certainly don&#039;t trust Facebook&#039;s discretion in how users&#039; data is subsequently disclosed. 

All the same, there may be a prosaic explanation for the policy change. Truly deleting data is hard -- it requires careful  system management and tracking of where a user&#039;s data wind up. If data are used for testing, or digests of them are distributed to advertisers, then it may become extremely difficult for Facebook to actually remove the information of a user who closes an account from the system -- even if they are acting in good faith. Facebook&#039;s lawyers and engineers may simply have decided that it is easier to unfetter their hands ahead of time. 

I am not suggesting that systems should be engineered this way, nor that Facebook is setting a good precedent (they&#039;re not!). But they may not yet plan on &quot;being evil&quot; (to borrow a line from another organization that has progressively diversified its usage of users&#039; data). 

Of course, once the fetters are off, temptation may be hard to resist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;  And why would they be changing their policy now if they don‚Äôt anticipate doing exactly this in the future?</p>
<p>I certainly don&#8217;t trust Facebook&#8217;s discretion in how users&#8217; data is subsequently disclosed. </p>
<p>All the same, there may be a prosaic explanation for the policy change. Truly deleting data is hard &#8212; it requires careful  system management and tracking of where a user&#8217;s data wind up. If data are used for testing, or digests of them are distributed to advertisers, then it may become extremely difficult for Facebook to actually remove the information of a user who closes an account from the system &#8212; even if they are acting in good faith. Facebook&#8217;s lawyers and engineers may simply have decided that it is easier to unfetter their hands ahead of time. </p>
<p>I am not suggesting that systems should be engineered this way, nor that Facebook is setting a good precedent (they&#8217;re not!). But they may not yet plan on &#8220;being evil&#8221; (to borrow a line from another organization that has progressively diversified its usage of users&#8217; data). </p>
<p>Of course, once the fetters are off, temptation may be hard to resist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
