Avoid cheap estradiol valerate rushing or pressurizing potty training, as this may cause a find viagra on internet child to feel anxious or stressed about using the potty cheap viagra in canada and lead to constipation. Doctors typically diagnose them in the atenolol for sale late stages of cancers such as ovarian cancer due to buy diovan online vague symptoms. Hypermobile EDS, which many experts now consider joint prednisolone no prescription hypermobility syndrome, affects the connective tissues. Healthcare professionals can also buy clindamycin gel online play a role in challenging diet culture by encouraging overall (metacam) pharmacy healthful behavior changes while being conscious of social determinants of get cheap cephalexin online effects health that influence these approaches. Because a woman has a buy cheap griseofulvin particularly high risk of developing blood clots in the vein clonidine online stores after giving birth, she should be aware of any potential find no rx vibramycin signs that could point to a life-threatening clot. The absence clomid of warnings or other information for a given drug does retin-a no prescription not indicate that the drug or drug combination is safe, effective,.

This is the sole case of copyright infringement by downloading that had actually gone to trial, prior to the case of Joel Tenenbaum in which Professor Charles Nesson is active. The Thomas case, which we discuss on page 198, is being re-tried after the judge threw out the first decision. Today Thomas’s expert, Prof. Yongdae Kim of the University of Minnesota, filed his report, which includes a strong attack on the evidence against Thomas and also on the report of the opposing expert. The site “RIAA v. the People” has a good summary, and a hotlink to Kim’s full report. For me the killer sentence is this:

MediaSentry claims to have much experience in identifying individual committing copyright infringement. However, they insist that their methods are proprietary and thus cannot be subject to scrutiny by an impartial third party. No academic studies exist of their internal investigative techniques, methods, software, data collection practices, or even employee training in retaining collected data in a way that would allow for it to be used as evidence at a trial.

MediaSentry is the private police force of the RIAA, of which Nesson also complains. How on earth can one defend oneself against a private investigator who makes a claim about what you did but says that its methodology for gathering the evidence is proprietary and even the judge can’t review it?

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009 at 11:22 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.