<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best wishes, Chris Soghoian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bitsbook.com/2009/03/best-wishes-chris-soghoian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bitsbook.com/2009/03/best-wishes-chris-soghoian/</link>
	<description>Your Life, Liberty and Happiness After the Digital Explosion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:55:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.bitsbook.com/2009/03/best-wishes-chris-soghoian/comment-page-1/#comment-1619</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 04:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitsbook.com/?p=422#comment-1619</guid>
		<description>Above points are good, but note that CNET was acquired by Viacom/CBS News not long ago. The mothership company wasn&#039;t there when Chris was brought on as a blogger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Above points are good, but note that CNET was acquired by Viacom/CBS News not long ago. The mothership company wasn&#8217;t there when Chris was brought on as a blogger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.bitsbook.com/2009/03/best-wishes-chris-soghoian/comment-page-1/#comment-1584</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitsbook.com/?p=422#comment-1584</guid>
		<description>To think that CNet would fire such a popular and outspoken evangelist because of a debatably &#039;factually incorrect&#039; headline is equally ludicrous, foo. Furthermore, the nature of the line &quot;No explanation, but it‚Äôs almost surely because he annoyed some powerful institutions&quot; is inherently speculative, and therefor does not require substantiation.

All that being said, I would like to know more about why he was fired, and find it curious that he hasn&#039;t been more outspoken about it himself, on his own blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To think that CNet would fire such a popular and outspoken evangelist because of a debatably &#8216;factually incorrect&#8217; headline is equally ludicrous, foo. Furthermore, the nature of the line &#8220;No explanation, but it‚Äôs almost surely because he annoyed some powerful institutions&#8221; is inherently speculative, and therefor does not require substantiation.</p>
<p>All that being said, I would like to know more about why he was fired, and find it curious that he hasn&#8217;t been more outspoken about it himself, on his own blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foo</title>
		<link>http://www.bitsbook.com/2009/03/best-wishes-chris-soghoian/comment-page-1/#comment-1580</link>
		<dc:creator>foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitsbook.com/?p=422#comment-1580</guid>
		<description>Chris Soghoian was fired from CNet because he posted an article under factually incorrect headline: &quot;White House ditches YouTube after privacy complaints&quot;.

The notion that he &quot;almost surely because he annoyed some powerful institutions&quot; by writing about cookies is unsubstantiated nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Soghoian was fired from CNet because he posted an article under factually incorrect headline: &#8220;White House ditches YouTube after privacy complaints&#8221;.</p>
<p>The notion that he &#8220;almost surely because he annoyed some powerful institutions&#8221; by writing about cookies is unsubstantiated nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
