The purchase cheapest without prescription absence of warnings or other information for a given drug cialis online sales does not indicate that the drug or drug combination is best price kenalog safe, effective, or appropriate for all patients or all specific canadian pharmacy buy uses. Individuals with a family history of thyroid cancer or best price for buy a history of rapid thyroid nodule growth may also require erythromycin for sale a biopsy. A thyroid nodule biopsy is a clinical procedure aldactone online stores to obtain a small tissue sample from the thyroid gland. methotrexate for sale The right thyroid medication dosage usually depends on a combination sale artane get of body weight and the severity of hypothyroidism. It is order amikacin important to stop taking thyroid medication only if there is a.

The discussions about how the Google Book settlement proposes to handle orphan works have expanded. A small group of which I am a member have formally sought to intervene. So has the Internet Archive. Today the NYT Bits Blog has a brief explanation, and some good commentary.

There have also been three articles that take up the settlement in a more serious way:

Randy Picker, “The Google Book Search Settlement: A New Orphan-works Monopoly?” Picker is an anti-trust lawyer. It’s a longish paper (though not by law review standards), but the first few pages provide a good summary.

Pamela Samuelson: “Legally Speaking: The Dead Souls of the Google Book Settlement.” An excellent, clear, short critique of the settlement. Easy to read for the layperson, highly recommended. This will be Samuelson’s column in the July issue of the Communications of the ACM.

James Grimmelmann, “The Google Book Settlement: Ends, Means, and the Future of Books” (pdf, 17 pages). An issues brief, thoughtful and analytical and complete.

I urge anyone interested to read the Samuelson piece in particular.

This entry was posted on Saturday, April 18th, 2009 at 11:06 pm and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.