In discount for no rx some cases, your doctor may prescribe the Mestinon oral tablets buy zyprexa without prescription or solution in combination with Mestinon extended-release tablets. ACCESSIBLE DRUG prednisolone prescription LABELS AND CONTAINERSSome pharmacies offer labels with large print, braille, discount zithromax or a code you scan with a smartphone to convert order viagra without prescription text to speech. During treatment, it's important to track your buy generic acomplia no prescription usa symptoms and let your doctor know if the prescribed dosage order discount viagra online is working for you. The drug information contained herein is cialis without rx subject to change and is not intended to cover all buy cheap prednisolone possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic reactions, or acomplia low price adverse effects. If you've received your first dose of Novavax gentamicin eye drops for order and miss your appointment for your second Novavax injection, call buy cheap mirapex your doctor's office or pharmacy as soon as possible to buy discount clindamycin sale jelly reschedule. Medical News Today has made every effort to make buy cheap diovan certain that all information is factually correct, comprehensive, and up to.

The discussions about how the Google Book settlement proposes to handle orphan works have expanded. A small group of which I am a member have formally sought to intervene. So has the Internet Archive. Today the NYT Bits Blog has a brief explanation, and some good commentary.

There have also been three articles that take up the settlement in a more serious way:

Randy Picker, “The Google Book Search Settlement: A New Orphan-works Monopoly?” Picker is an anti-trust lawyer. It’s a longish paper (though not by law review standards), but the first few pages provide a good summary.

Pamela Samuelson: “Legally Speaking: The Dead Souls of the Google Book Settlement.” An excellent, clear, short critique of the settlement. Easy to read for the layperson, highly recommended. This will be Samuelson’s column in the July issue of the Communications of the ACM.

James Grimmelmann, “The Google Book Settlement: Ends, Means, and the Future of Books” (pdf, 17 pages). An issues brief, thoughtful and analytical and complete.

I urge anyone interested to read the Samuelson piece in particular.

This entry was posted on Saturday, April 18th, 2009 at 11:06 pm and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.