Typically, tetracycline medicine a doctor will be able to successfully diagnose olecranon bursitis buy advair without prescription due to the distinctive swelling of the olecranon bursa. They order tizanidine involve difficulties detecting, recognizing, discriminating, comprehending, and perceiving auditory information. order discount viagra However, this article should not be used as a substitute online pharmacy cialis for the knowledge and expertise of a licensed healthcare professional. generic ampicillin Research also suggests that there is a strong genetic link buy generic aldactone between a person having anorexia and developing other mental health find discount glyburide online conditions, such as other eating disorders, depression, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. cialis cheapest price If you develop eye problems while taking Tarceva, your doctor atarax for sale will likely pause your treatment until your condition improves. People viagra online sale should seek immediate medical attention if they experience any signs discount clomid of dehydration or any severe or worsening symptoms. An unbalanced drug viagra online purchase diet restricts opportunities for physical development and increases the risk purchase generic diclofenac alternatives problems of obesity. ACCESSIBLE DRUG LABELS AND CONTAINERSSome pharmacies offer labels buy generic cialis problems with large print, braille, or a code you scan with a.

The discussions about how the Google Book settlement proposes to handle orphan works have expanded. A small group of which I am a member have formally sought to intervene. So has the Internet Archive. Today the NYT Bits Blog has a brief explanation, and some good commentary.

There have also been three articles that take up the settlement in a more serious way:

Randy Picker, “The Google Book Search Settlement: A New Orphan-works Monopoly?” Picker is an anti-trust lawyer. It’s a longish paper (though not by law review standards), but the first few pages provide a good summary.

Pamela Samuelson: “Legally Speaking: The Dead Souls of the Google Book Settlement.” An excellent, clear, short critique of the settlement. Easy to read for the layperson, highly recommended. This will be Samuelson’s column in the July issue of the Communications of the ACM.

James Grimmelmann, “The Google Book Settlement: Ends, Means, and the Future of Books” (pdf, 17 pages). An issues brief, thoughtful and analytical and complete.

I urge anyone interested to read the Samuelson piece in particular.

This entry was posted on Saturday, April 18th, 2009 at 11:06 pm and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.