Blown To Bits

“Monstrous and Shocking” Music Downloading Fine

Monday, January 25th, 2010 by Harry Lewis
AMD real serevent without prescription occurs when the macula becomes thinner over time or suffers buy generic atrovent online damage from atypical blood cells that grow behind the eye. order remeron Weight loss was also rarely reported in clinical trials for discount synthroid no rx Lamictal XR, while weight gain wasn't reported. ALCL may occur cream drug in the skin, lymph nodes or organs throughout the body, viagra no rx required or scar tissue around breast implants. However, further large-scale research buy cheap gentamicin eye drops is necessary to determine the effectiveness of the essential oil, buy free cialis prescription especially for people with PsA. Potentially dangerous behaviors may also xalatan sale be lessened by use of these medications," said Dr. Merrill. cafergot buy online While benign tumors can sometimes cause health problems depending on atarax sale their location, they are not cancerous. Those with HPD may order cheap drops sale dosage constantly attempt to become the center of attention, feel they norvasc for order need to entertain everyone around them, and express their emotions buy cheap advair in a dramatic way. However, some plant-based products contain fillers cheap atarax internet and added sodium and may be high in saturated fats. If.

That is the way appeals court judge Michael Davis described the $1.92 million fine levied on Jammie Thomas (now Jammie Thomas-Rasset) for illegally downloading 24 songs using Kazaa. This is the case we discuss in Chapter 5—Thomas was one of the only people who tried to fight the charges in court. That’s $80,000 per song.

The judge reduced the fine to $54,000, and apparently is unhappy that he couldn’t reduce it further, saying, “This reduced award is significant and harsh [but is] no longer monstrous and shocking.” This may still ruin Thomas, but suggests that the judiciary itself may scold Congress about the absurdity of the present statutory damages structure for copyright infringement.

Comments are closed.