Blown To Bits

Y2010?

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010 by Harry Lewis
An buy viagra without prescription overactive bladder (OAB) is a urinary condition characterized by a atrovent vendors sudden and uncontrollable urge to urinate, often accompanied by symptoms, order griseofulvin such as nocturia. A doctor will perform a physical exam cheapest generic (ovral of the pelvic area and may test the strength of buy cialis generic the pelvic floor muscles or whether urine leaks during certain glyburide sale free pharmacy activities, such as bending over. Some children also have delays clindamycin gel for sale in learning speech or other skills that are not a order clonidine lowest price dosage result of any diagnosis. In severe cases, people with anorexia find viagra online may be unable or unwilling to eat, leading to severe clozapine online stores malnutrition, electrolyte imbalances, and organ damage, all of which can be.

The problems that were widely feared fro the year 2000 — computers failing to add 1 to 1999 correctly because they had been coded to use only two digits for the “year” field — have actually occurred, 10 years late. There have been two reports of software thinking the day after December 31, 2009 is January 1, 2016.

Some phones are showing 2016 dates on received text messages.

And some retail computer terminals are making the same mistake, causing them to reject customer credit cards with expiration dates prior to 2016.

What’s up? There is some speculation on Slashdot that (a) only the last two digits are being stored (“10” instead of “2010”), and then (b) the “10” is somehow being interpreted as hexadecimal rather than decimal (which would make it decimal 16).

Nothing is truly hard to imagine in the hearts and minds of a corner-cutting coder, but (a), in this day of cheap memory and with the Y2K problem still in our rear view mirrors, would be really dumb, and (b) requires imagining a really perverse data representation (encoding the decimal digits in successive 4-bit “nibbles”, and then forgetting that you’d done that and interpreting the fully 8-bit byte as a binary number).

Comments are closed.