Blown To Bits

DOJ to Court: Nix Again to Google Books Settlement

Thursday, February 4th, 2010 by Harry Lewis
It pyrantel pamoate without prescription is important to set boundaries with someone with paranoid personality buy nasonex online disorder, even if they are a loved one. Anyone with discount clomid questions about tax credits may also find the Internal Revenue buy free methotrexate no prescription dosage Service's help center useful. They may use a combination of get cheapest ampicillin low price canada radiation, hormone therapy, chemotherapy, and surgery to manage the progression generic cialis no prescription jelly of the cancer and the symptoms that may accompany it. discount cialis Swapping out dairy-based drinks, a known migraine trigger, for almond buy prednisolone sale milk could have additional benefits for migraine prevention. Scientists have purchase cheap viagra without prescription india not yet tested the following ADHD time management techniques in cheapest generic glyburide a more rigorous, objective way. According to the Centers for generic mirapex info Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), GBS has occurred after people artane received the Johnson and Johnson (Janssen) vaccine but not after cheap viagra in canada the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccine. These tests can determine whether order discount cephalexin side effects effects a baby is likely to have CF or, sometimes, if they.

The Justice Department objected strenuously to the draft Google Books settlement on antitrust grounds, and when Google went back behind doors with the Authors and Publishers to revise it, the DOJ’s objections were among those take most seriously in the revision. But the DOJ has just announced that it is still unhappy. The DOJ’s objections are very basic: “The [revised settlement proposal] suffers from the same core problem as the original agreement: it is an attempt to use the class action mechanism to implement forward-looking business arrangements that go far beyond the dispute before the Court in this litigation.” That sounds like a problem that is going to be hard to fix with some clever lawyering alone, and the reports don’t suggest that Google is interested in going back for another try at redrafting. So we may be nearing high noon, where Judge Chin just has to give the thumbs-up or thumbs-down on a matter of monumental importance to the world of books and of ideas. Stay tuned; February 18 is his date for the final hearing.

Comments are closed.