Blown To Bits

Another “How We Could Know Less”: South Africa Wants to Ban Internet Porn

Saturday, May 29th, 2010 by Harry Lewis
The buy triamterene online drug can only be given by a healthcare professional who purchase cheap xalatan sale overdose has received special training to manage certain serious side effects* generic quinine that are possible during Talvey treatment. Nonallergic asthma produces similar get cheap cafergot online effects symptoms triggered by other factors such as exercise, stress, or order cialis no prescription extreme weather conditions. Study results have been similarly inconsistent on without viagra get prescription discount how a seated position may affect a person's blood pressure. cheap augmentin price dangers Individuals can create a custom plan by choosing the number amoxicillin for sale of items they want, the number of deliveries they need, buy cialis once daily and a delivery date. Regular check-ups and follow-up care play information no tetracycline prescription buy cheap a crucial role in identifying the recurrence of cervical cancer. People.

Democracies are remarkably ready to adopt the censorship technologies of nations they claim to loathe. Our example du jour is the government of South Africa, which proposes to ban Internet pornography. All of it — not just bad stuff like child pornography.

And why not, say the social arbiters within the government? A deputy Home Minister says, “Cars are already provided with brakes and seatbelts… There is no reason why the internet should be provided without the necessary restrictive mechanisms built into it.”

There are a few problems with this idea, to say the least. First is that it won’t work. Any filter will fail to detect encrypted images — though of course you could outlaw encryption. Problem is, you probably want your banking transactions encrypted.

So any porn detector is going to have lots of false negatives.

But there are the false positives too. This is the old problem of figuring out what the government censors will consider pornographic. Perhaps South Africa has figured out how to define it, but I doubt it. Will anatomical atlases be banned? Breastfeeding guides? Sex manuals, for that matter? What about The Ecstasy of St Teresa? Somebody has to decide, and where there is legal liability for guessing wrong, a great deal of worthwhile material will be redacted. Self-censorship works rather well, actually.

Comments are closed.