Levitra india, More than a year ago, when the Supreme Court upheld the FCC's authority to fineFox Television Stations for "fleeting expletives" uttered by Bono and others, we noted that the court made only a technical ruling and some of the opinions were sympathetic to Fox's position on the underlying and more important First Amendment question:  was the rule the FCC applied too vague, capricious, and uncertain so that it chilled speech. Technology has changed, we noted, and perhaps it is time for the rules to change too, Cheap levitra no rx, since they were always premised on an argument that television and radio were exceptional technologies, by comparison with books, for example.

The case went back to the lower court, which took up the constitutional question, Texas TX Tex., and ruled against the FCC. (New York Times story.) The judge in the case made a number of correct observations--why should the standards be different for cable TV than for broadcast TV, for example. Order cheap levitra online, She did not rule out the possibility of the FCC adopting rules that would be constitutional, and noted that she was bound by the Supreme Court's 1978 Pacifica decision which made that FCC authority clear. But for the moment, the networks can relax a bit about prosecution for the occasional cuss out of the blue --- for example, the one in a discussion of Middle East policy that was spoken by a US President to a British Prime Minister, and which the broadcast networks had to bleep out, levitra india.

It will be interesting to see what the government does now. It could appeal, but the case seems like a loser, herbal levitra, and an appeal all the way to the Supreme Court could backfire, since Justice Thomas signaled that there may well be five votes for overturning Pacifica and costing the government all of its regulatory authority over televised speech.

In other speech control news:

A judge in Pennsylvania signed an order, Arkansas AR Ark., drafted by a defense attorney, requiring newspapers to expunge their archives of all mention of the defendants' arrest. The defense attorney actually has part of the logic right: "What's the sense in having your record expunged if anyone can Google you and it comes up?" He's right that expungement orders have been blown to bits. Levitra india, He's just wrong that the way to fix that problem is retroactive censorship of the printed word. It's a problem that can't really be fixed, in the U.S, ordering levitra online legally. anyway. What was this judge thinking.

Also, Levitra prescription, a couple of notes on anonymity. I was reading Richard Clarke's book Cyber War, which makes a compelling case for a more controlled version of the Internet by riding roughshod over civil liberties concerns, levitra india. Having described the Internet as basically a hippie invention ("the Internet as we know it today is deeply imbued with the sensibilities and campus politics of [the 1960s]"), Clarke scornfully distances himself from any respect for anonymous speech, or reading.

The "open Internet" people believe that if you wish to read The Communist Manifesto, buy levitra pills, or research treatments for venereal disease, or document China's human rights violations, or watch porn online, Köpa billiga levitra, your access to that information will not be free if anyone knows that you are looking at it.

So much not just for Vint Cerf, but for the professional and legal standards governing libraries in most states in the U.S. He comes off sounding just like the Chinese government in its latest "explanation" about how it will control the Internet. "We will make the Internet real name system a reality as soon as possible," a Chinese official said recently, order levitra online legally, referring to a requirement that Chinese will in the future have to use their actual names in all Internet communications, no anonymous postings or emails allowed. Just what Clarke would like to see happen here.

Similar posts: Levitra no prescription. Soma without prescription. Propecia sale. Xenical cost. Meridia cheap. Canada prozac. Buy ultram cheap. Buy viagra no prescription. Where to buy cialis. Tramadol alternative.
Trackbacks from:

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 14th, 2010 at 9:11 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech, Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.