Now here is an interesting Twitter feed: A running report on every book being checked out Discount viagra, of all of Harvard's libraries. Viagra ablets, Feels voyeuristic to me, but you have to stretch your imagination to figure out how this would be an invasion of privacy, viagra online kopen. Om viagra online, If the tweets are close to real time, maybe somebody could watch who comes out of Widener library right after "Anglo-Saxon Wills" was checked out, comprar viagra, California CA Calif., and maybe identify the person who is trying to challenge a millennium-old bequest. (That is a real example -- at least the name of the book part.) Still, bestill viagra online, North Carolina NC N.C., even without being able to figure out who is reading this stuff, knowing that SOMEBODY is RIGHT NOW finding a need to read that classic tome, viagra canadian, Viagra thorold, "Documents diplomatiques. Deuxième Conférence internationale pour la répression de la traite des blanches (18 avril-4 mai 1910), cheapest viagra online," -- well, I just can't help thinking it is none of my business. The book is about the white slave trade, discount viagra. Am I just a prude.

Re-identification is a very sophisticated art these days. Maybe someone can figure out how to make mischief by correlating these data with some other source. I can't think of a way off the top of my head. What think you.

Similar posts: Price of meridia. Purchase prozac. Purchase ultram online. Viagra discount. Cialis online cheap. Tramadol online stores. Levitra pharmacy. Soma prescription. Propecia without a prescription. Tramadol for sale.
Trackbacks from:

Cheapest cialis, Especially if it is the government that has the capability. Bio cialis, How many times were we told that the full body scanners at airports would be incapable of storing and transmitting images. Turns out they actually do have that capability, Can i use cialis for whole life. Online cialis, In one courthouse they have been used to store tens of thousands of images, apparently to reduce staffing demands (CNET report here), Køb discount cialis. Cialis china, If something bad happens later, they can go back and check the images. The Electronic Privacy Information Center has filed suit about this, cheap cialis overnight delivery.

The TSA spec document (pdf here), obtained by EPIC, says "the capability to capture images of non-passengers for training and evaluation purposes is needed," a capability that seems to have been used by one TSA worker to tease another about the size of his genitalia (ACLU report here), cheapest cialis. Cialis sale for man, I happen to have no problem personally with full body scanners, but I am sympathetic with people who do, New York NY N.Y.. Billige cialis apotek, (This is a little a homeless person saying he has no problem with burglars. My body scan would not bring much on the image market.) Of course, order cialis without prescription, what the government has accomplished by misrepresenting what the machines can do is to make it more likely that people like me will resist using them, or cooperating with any other kind of government data gathering. This should have been the lesson of the Bush warrantless wiretaps. It is one of the side effects of government growth that it becomes harder to monitor and those inside it become increasingly relaxed about infringements of publicly stated policies, as along as they judge that the exceptions either minor or due to extraordinary circumstances, and are meant ultimately to benefit the public.

Similar posts: Buy levitra. Soma online. Cheap propecia. Xenical medicine. Meridia price. Prozac canada. Generic ultram. Viagra online without prescription. Cialis sales. Discount tramadol.
Trackbacks from:

Order tramadol, So some clown, sorry, security researcher has done a scan of every Facebook profile his robot could reach and assembled a file of all their public information, and posted it for download. 100 million profiles.

I could have done it, Illinois IL Ill.. You could have done it. φτηνές φαρμακείο tramadol, No need to bother, though, because Ron Bowes did it for you, comprare tramadol.

This is one of those things that is not a technology story, order tramadol. It's an ontology story, Pharmacie tramadol bon marché, or a spiritual story, or something.

Facebook reports that it's all public information, Nevada NV Nev., public because the users wanted it public. Köpa tramadol online, So there is no news here, in their view.
"No private data is available or has been compromised, Kentucky KY Ky.,” as they say. And they are correct technically. Order tramadol, Why is it creepier to have your data in a file with 99,999,999 other profiles, on everybody's laptop, when the same information about you would have turned up in a Facebook query, or a Google search for that matter. Ordering tramadol without prescription, Public is public, right.

The aggregation sure makes it feel different, cheap tramadol from canada. But that is a matter of feelings, Buy tramadol overnight delivery, and Facebook's response was written by its legal team. For lawyers, everything is a binary. Things are either black or white. But privacy has lots of grey.

The Telegraph has a good report on it.

Similar posts: Cheapest levitra. Order soma. Propecia india. Xenical from india. Meridia pills. Prozac generic. Ultram uk. Buy viagra online. Buy cialis without prescription. Buy cheap tramadol.
Trackbacks from:

Levitra india, More than a year ago, when the Supreme Court upheld the FCC's authority to fineFox Television Stations for "fleeting expletives" uttered by Bono and others, we noted that the court made only a technical ruling and some of the opinions were sympathetic to Fox's position on the underlying and more important First Amendment question:  was the rule the FCC applied too vague, capricious, and uncertain so that it chilled speech. Technology has changed, we noted, and perhaps it is time for the rules to change too, Cheap levitra no rx, since they were always premised on an argument that television and radio were exceptional technologies, by comparison with books, for example.

The case went back to the lower court, which took up the constitutional question, Texas TX Tex., and ruled against the FCC. (New York Times story.) The judge in the case made a number of correct observations--why should the standards be different for cable TV than for broadcast TV, for example. Order cheap levitra online, She did not rule out the possibility of the FCC adopting rules that would be constitutional, and noted that she was bound by the Supreme Court's 1978 Pacifica decision which made that FCC authority clear. But for the moment, the networks can relax a bit about prosecution for the occasional cuss out of the blue --- for example, the one in a discussion of Middle East policy that was spoken by a US President to a British Prime Minister, and which the broadcast networks had to bleep out, levitra india.

It will be interesting to see what the government does now. It could appeal, but the case seems like a loser, herbal levitra, and an appeal all the way to the Supreme Court could backfire, since Justice Thomas signaled that there may well be five votes for overturning Pacifica and costing the government all of its regulatory authority over televised speech.

In other speech control news:

A judge in Pennsylvania signed an order, Arkansas AR Ark., drafted by a defense attorney, requiring newspapers to expunge their archives of all mention of the defendants' arrest. The defense attorney actually has part of the logic right: "What's the sense in having your record expunged if anyone can Google you and it comes up?" He's right that expungement orders have been blown to bits. Levitra india, He's just wrong that the way to fix that problem is retroactive censorship of the printed word. It's a problem that can't really be fixed, in the U.S, ordering levitra online legally. anyway. What was this judge thinking.

Also, Levitra prescription, a couple of notes on anonymity. I was reading Richard Clarke's book Cyber War, which makes a compelling case for a more controlled version of the Internet by riding roughshod over civil liberties concerns, levitra india. Having described the Internet as basically a hippie invention ("the Internet as we know it today is deeply imbued with the sensibilities and campus politics of [the 1960s]"), Clarke scornfully distances himself from any respect for anonymous speech, or reading.

The "open Internet" people believe that if you wish to read The Communist Manifesto, buy levitra pills, or research treatments for venereal disease, or document China's human rights violations, or watch porn online, Köpa billiga levitra, your access to that information will not be free if anyone knows that you are looking at it.

So much not just for Vint Cerf, but for the professional and legal standards governing libraries in most states in the U.S. He comes off sounding just like the Chinese government in its latest "explanation" about how it will control the Internet. "We will make the Internet real name system a reality as soon as possible," a Chinese official said recently, order levitra online legally, referring to a requirement that Chinese will in the future have to use their actual names in all Internet communications, no anonymous postings or emails allowed. Just what Clarke would like to see happen here.

Similar posts: Levitra no prescription. Soma without prescription. Propecia sale. Xenical cost. Meridia cheap. Canada prozac. Buy ultram cheap. Buy viagra no prescription. Where to buy cialis. Tramadol alternative.
Trackbacks from:

Soma from india, Either it's an election year, or the Massachusetts Legislature and Governor don't understand how the Internet works. Or both.

Close readers of this blog will remember my discussion back in February of a case in Massachusetts where some creep got off the hook for sending lewd text messages to a child, because the relevant statutory definition of "matter" not to be disseminated did not include text messages. At the time, I said that the definitional problem was easily remedied.

So the Commonwealth remedied it, by including not just text messages but the entire Internet, billig kaufen soma. The new clause in the definition reads as follows:

any electronic communication including, but not limited to, electronic mail, instant messages, text messages, and any other communication created by means of use of the Internet or wireless network

This definition certainly plugs the legal loophole through which that creep escaped after sending little Johnny a text message, soma from india. Unfortunately the clause also captures Johnny finding his way to the online edition of Fanny Hill, or Memoir of a Woman of Pleasure, or to a site such as Dr. Marty Klein's "sexed.org," which gives "Straight Talk on Sex, Love, Goedkope soma apotheek, and Intimacy." It may also include this site, since I just linked to that 18th century novel and that 21st century advice site. And maybe it applies to any social networking site where someone posts a comment linking to any of the above.

The problem, as ArsTechnica explains, is that "disseminate" is a term carried over from the days when one obtained information by going into a bookstore and buying it. Soma from india, The clerk at the book store could look at Johnnie and tell he was 13, or ask him for an ID if he looked like he might be 17 rather than 18. It also nicely covered sending obscene stuff telephonically or by postal delivery, since those are person-to-person media, cheap soma pills. The way information flows through the Internet makes it impossible to know where it is going. And there is nothing in the statute that restricts the crime to cases in which you actually know that you've reached a minor. You just have to reach a minor, and to know that what you disseminated is harmful to minors.

Dr, soma from india. Klein, the ACLU, Minnesota MN Minn., Harvard Book Store, and several other plaintiffs have asked for an injunction blocking the law, which took effect yesterday. The complaint (pdf, 44 pages) makes a number of strong points, of which perhaps the most disturbing is this:

The United States Congress and the states of Arizona, Michigan, New Mexico, soma prices, South Carolina, Vermont and Virginia previously enacted laws which, like Sections 2 and 3, applied the harmful to minors test to Internet speech. All of them were either held unconstitutional or enjoined on First Amendment grounds. Ohio and Utah also passed such laws. Soma from india, The Ohio statute has been narrowed by the courts to constitutional dimensions. Ordering soma online cheap, The Utah statute is being challenged in federal court and has been preliminarily enjoined.

This is where I begin to wonder about the effect of the election cycle. Why enact a censorship law pretty much identical to others that have been ruled unconstitutional, if not because it will be politically popular to do so?

In the same vein, the National Review offers an article by Jonah Goldberg and Nick Schulz, Gated or X-Rated? The authors ridicule the open-Internet gurus, and defend Apple for its effort to create a walled garden with no porn. They encourage legislative measures that will support private-sector solutions to the problem of children seeing bad stuff--their particular proposal is the creation of a .kids domain, where only child-friendly stuff would appear, Michigan MI Mich.. (And where apparently it would be impossible for any 17-year-old to find a link to sexed.org.) The authors specifically call out Free Press and Public Knowledge for transforming the Internet's "sensible design principle into something approaching an ideology." "… [T]he culture of the Internet is to oppose anything approaching actual culture. Strong cultures edit and constrict," they say, soma from india. Well, it depends what you mean by "culture." What is the culture of paper, or of books. There isn't any. Anything goes. Buy soma prescription, Of course society can control what gets printed--except that the culture of the U.S., as defined in its constitution, is that it can't be controlled very much--and not in ways, as the Supreme Court has repeatedly held, that would unreasonably restrict what adults can legally see.

Nonetheless, Goldberg and Schulz argue, we should have more edited, constricted, availability of soma in pakistan, walled-off parts of the Internet. Soma from india, They use the metaphor of the "frontier" to describe the goal of the Internet utopians, suggesting that their real agenda--Noam Chomsky gets a shout, of all people--is anti-corporate.

In addition to the practical problems of keeping a big part of the webby structure sterile, the problem is that every attempt to legislate Internet safety has proved to be over-inclusive, to violate the plain language of the First Amendment. And relying on private parties would be a lot less frightening if the world were not converging on a few private information monopolies. If Google and Apple and a handful of media companies control all the content and all the pipes, the private sector "alternatives" become the sole sources.

Recommended reading: Closing the Digital Frontier, in the Atlantic, by Michael Hirschorn. Buy soma no rx, It is an apt metaphor, but it leaves one thinking that Goldberg and Schulz have nothing to worry about. All the digital land is going to be owned and controlled by a few private players anyway, and they will make sure that the Internet provides just what best suits their business purposes.

It is always sad to see conservatives, who ought to be the biggest worriers about information freedom, find common cause with the nanny-staters such as our Massachusetts legislators.

.

Similar posts: Levitra tablets. Cost of soma. Propecia prices. Xenical buy. Meridia tablet. Buy cheap prozac online. Buy generic ultram. Cheap generic viagra. Cheap cialis online. Cheap tramadol tablets.
Trackbacks from:

Propecia pills, In the world of social media, it is hard to get the privacy defaults right, because the whole point of social media is to connect with other people. So you want to make that easy, αγοράσετε propecia, Propecia with no prescription legality, so people don't have to fight the system. And of course there is a network effect so the designers tip toward connecting more people to each other rather than less, comprar propecia de descuento, Propecia in india, where there is a choice. They don't always get the design right, παραγγείλετε online propecia, Propecia without prescription, as the Google Buzz fiasco showed.

But then things happen that are just bugs, ordering propecia bars, Billig propecia apotek, or unanticipated reactions between multiple databases and applications. In which category it seems the current problem with Microsoft Messenger falls, propecia pills. InfoWorld explains it thus:

Consider this sobering scenario: You and your boss use Windows Live Messenger (or MSN Messenger or Windows Messenger) to keep in touch. One day, you get a job offer from Snidely Whiplash at a competing company across town. You and Snidely have a brief IM conversation, using Messenger. Innocent and private, yes. Propecia pills, Well, no.

The next time your boss logs into Hotmail -- not Messenger, mind you, but Hotmail -- your boss glances at the initial Hotmail screen and sees that you and Snidely have become "friends." That's what the notice says: "Woody Leonhard and Snidely Whiplash are now friends."

Or think wife and girlfriend, instead of boss and competitor. Any two people with whom you are IM'ing who should certainly not be made aware that they are both part of your social circle.

This problem persists no matter how you have the privacy settings set. It's the sort of high-stakes privacy glitch that undermines people's trust in the entire Internet. Who knows what will go wrong with the next release of your favorite communications app.

Similar posts: Cheapest levitra prices. Lowest price soma. Online propecia. Order xenical online. Pharmacy meridia. Price of prozac. Purchase ultram. Purchase viagra online. Cialis discount. Tramadol online cheap.
Trackbacks from:

Xenical generic, A federal appeals court has handed down a worrisome decision in the case of Golan v. Holder et al (decision available on DocStoc here). As part of the Uruguay Round Agreements ("URAA") on international copyright, Xenical pills, the U.S. agreed to extend copyright protection to certain foreign works which had previously been in the public domain in the U.S. Indeed, some of those erstwhile public domain works had been used by U.S, Um xenical online. artists and writers to create derivative works, xenical generic. For example, one Richard Kapp, Order xenical no rx, now deceased but whose estate is a plaintiff in the case, used a sound recording based on works by Dmitri Shostakovich to create a work of his own. Having in good faith acted creatively with public domain works, such plaintiffs now find that Congress has cut their legs out from under them, cheap xenical no prescription, and maintained that Congress infringed their First Amendment rights.

The courts that dealt with the case went back and forth and this judicial stop is probably not its last. India cosmos xenical, The court ruled that the government had sufficient reason to act as it did. Xenical generic, Here is the key sentence, from page 12 of the decision.

The government argues on appeal that Section 514 is narrowly tailored to advancing three important governmental interests: (1) attaining indisputable compliance with international treaties and multilateral agreements, (2) obtaining legal protections for American copyright holders’ interests abroad, and (3) remedying past inequities of foreign authors who lost or never obtained copyrights in the United States, pharmacy xenical. We hold that the government has demonstrated a substantial interest in protecting American copyright holders’ interests abroad, and Section 514 is narrowly tailored to advance that interest.

In other words, Xenical farmacia a buon mercato, there are American copyright holders (the Motion Picture Association of America and several other agents of the content industries presented themselves as amici) who stand to benefit, because their works, previously in the public domain abroad, will now be protected, xenical overnight delivery. The judge carefully stated that he was offering no opinion on rationales (1) and (3).

Copyright and free speech are always in some tension. There is ample reason to believe that copyright has been the winner in that dynamic for the past 15 years or so, xenical generic. Cheap xenical for sale, What is interesting here is the deference the U.S. is giving, and the court is supporting, to an international treaty as the basis for copyright expansion, xenical at albertson. Because the protests over the drafted-in-secret Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, ACTA, are getting intense. See Public Knowledge's take and invitation to write to the White House. So the combination of treaty and copyright in the Golan case sounds alarm bells. Stay tuned.

On ACTA, see also the statement on the site of the Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property.

Similar posts: Levitra online stores. Soma pharmacy. Propecia prescription. Xenical without a prescription. Levitra for sale. Buy soma. Propecia online. Cheap xenical. Meridia medicine. Prozac price.
Trackbacks from:

Meridia uk, A fascinating case has been before the US Supreme Court this spring. Opponents of a gay civil union statute in Washington state petitioned to place its repeal on the ballot so voters could have the last word. Backers of the law asked the Secretary of State to declare the names of the petitioners a public record and post the names on the Web. Meridia italia, The petitioners sued the state to prevent publication, saying they feared harassment.

It's a wonderful puzzle. Both sides claim their free speech rights are at stake: the one side holding that the names are really part of the legislative process for which transparency is essential; and the other side arguing that their capacity to speak freely requires a level of anonymity, meridia uk. It's an Internet-created issue, För meridia online, because although petitions have been around for centuries, until now it would have been impossible to publish them quickly enough to influence an election, Cheap meridia tablets, and to sort and analyze them effectively enough to be a serious privacy threat.

The court's decision is at once one-sided and inconclusive. By an 8-1 vote the court decided the immediate question before it: Petitions are, generally speaking, kopen goedkope meridia, public. But the near-unanimity is only superficial, Meridia no prescription, and may not even settle the question of the case at hand. Most, but not all, of the 8 allowed that there might be circumstances---some credible risk of harm, Osta meridia, for example---under which petitioners would have a right to keep their names from being published. So the case goes back to a lower court, αγοράζουν φτηνά meridia, but may rise back up again.

What is most interesting is that the views of the justices cut obliquely across the usual liberal-conservative lines. In fact, the justice who is the most dismissive of any privacy right, viager same meridia, and the sole justice who would have made privacy the norm, not the exception, Mississippi MS Miss., are the two most conservative justices, Scalia and Thomas, who rarely split their votes on anything. Scalia called for “civic courage, without which democracy is doomed, womens meridia,” and added that he does “not look forward to a society which … exercises the direct democracy of initiative and referendum hidden from public scrutiny and protected from the accountability of criticism.” Thomas held with equal conviction that routinely publishing the names of petition signers would unacceptably chill free speech through a loss of “associational right to privacy.”

A case of the Internet confusing the traditional alignments on free speech issues..

Similar posts: Ultram canada. Generic viagra. Cialis online without prescription. Tramadol sales. Discount levitra. Cheapest soma. Order propecia. Xenical india. Meridia from india. Prozac pills.
Trackbacks from:

That is the name of the bill Buy prozac online, introduced this week by Senators Lieberman, Collins, and Carper, giving broad powers to the executive branch to control the Internet in case of certain emergencies. It is an important bill and it's going to excite a lot of discussion about how much we need, and how much we fear, government control of the Internet. Ohio OH, The worries have been growing. A year ago a similar bill was introduced by Jay Rockefeller of WV. Richard Clarke's Cyberwar is #1605 on Amazon as I write this post. We all know the damage that teenagers and criminals can do -- imagine what an organized cyber-attack orchestrated by our enemies could accomplish, buy prozac online.

As the worries have been growing, so has the skepticism, Alabama AL Ala.. There was a terrific Intelligence Squared debate a couple of weeks ago about whether the "cyberwar" risks had been exaggerated. Mike McConnell of Booz Allen Hamilton, and former director of the NSA, How to get prozac, argued that the risks had not been exaggerated, and he was joined by Jonathan Zittrain. Arguing the other side were privacy expert Marc Rotenberg and computer security expert Bruce Schneier. Buy prozac online, Shneier listed some of the purple language that had been used to describe the attacks that are occurring already -- 9/11, Pearl Harbor, etc. -- and noted that we in the U.S. love to use war language for describing things that are not wars but crimes, αγοράζουν online prozac, almost as much as we hate labeling as wars things that really are wars, our decade-old undeclared wars abroad. McConnell acknowledged that "war" is a metaphor, Iowa IA, but so was "Cold War," and no one doubts that the risk was real and that we won.

But it was Rotenberg who drilled down on the underlying problem with the rhetoric, which is not the semantic question of metaphors and language, but that purple language has repeatedly been used by the government in the past to argue for sweeping technological controls that undermine personal liberties, order prozac. Rotenberg referred to the demands (recounted in Chapter 5) for government control of encryption technology, key escrow requirements, and the proposed requirement for the Clipper Chip), buy prozac online. None of these supposedly essential measures wound up being approved, Rotenberg notes, and here are our friends from NSA back to help us again. Seattle prozac, McConnell responded that there was no danger to civil liberties -- you just have to get the laws right and then unwarranted government surveillance would be illegal. Mark exploded that mere illegality had not stopped warrantless wiretapping under the Bush administration. McConnell promised to return to the issue if asked to, but it never happened. Buy prozac online, I do think that exchange was at the crux of the issue. If you could trust the government, Oklahoma OK Okla., we wouldn't worry about government monitoring what we are doing. But the whole Constitution is premised on the fact that we can't trust the government always to do the right thing. Even reasonable-sounding laws are written with vague edges -- especially laws about technology, Idaho ID, which are drafted to cover innovations that haven't happened yet. Prosecutors and other government officials, confronted with people they don't like and a law with elastic edges, will stretch the law to cover the situation, and such cases often don't even come to trial because the defendant pleads to a lesser charge rather than risk the judgment of the court on whether a harsh law is being stretched too far, prozac online. (See Harvey Silverglate's gripping and scary Three Felonies a Day.)

The Lieberman-Collins proposal allows the President to declare a "national cyber emergency" (the term is defined, but based on the examples in Clarke's book and McConnell's debate remarks, the NSA would probably argue that we have been in one several times, perhaps continuously), buy prozac online. A new bureaucracy, the National Center for Cybersecurity and Communications, would reside within Homeland Security and would be charged with developing plans for responding to emergencies and seeing that they are implemented. CNET's Declan McCullagh described the legislation as creating an Internet "kill switch," separating problematic servers from the Net by government edict. Lieberman's spokespeople were offended, saying that the legislation actually restricted authority the president already had under the 1934 Telecommunications Act.

The devil will be in the details.

Missing in the immediate reaction is the answer to a question raised by Chris Soghoian in the Intelligence Squared debate. None of this would be as much of a problem if our computer software wasn't buggy. If Microsoft's operating system were not so vulnerable to attack, the risks to the nation of being attacked would be a lot less. Is anyone in Washington thinking about requiring Internet security  at that level--with some significant financial penalties for violators.

Similar posts: Ultram generic. Viagra uk. Buy cialis online. Buy tramadol without prescription. Buy cheap levitra. Soma no prescription. Propecia without prescription. Xenical sale. Meridia cost. Prozac cheap.
Trackbacks from:

Buy ultram without prescription, We owe a big debt to researchers at Carnegie Mellon University, who took it upon themselves to disinfect this blog. As reported earlier, cheap ultram bars, Ultram uk, it had been riddled with links to an online drug store, which was riding the coat tails of our Google page rank to attract hits, buy ultram cheap. Ordering ultram overnight delivery, Huge thanks to Timothy Vidas and Nicolas Christin for figuring out how the infection worked and resolving it. And thanks to Tyler Moore for connecting us to them, buy ultram. Connecticut CT Conn.. Nombres para ultrams en frances. Buy ultram online cheap. Order ultram no prescription. Comprar en línea ultram.

Similar posts: Canada ultram. Buy viagra cheap. Buy cialis no prescription. Where to buy tramadol. Levitra alternative. Soma tablets. Cost of propecia. Xenical prices. Meridia buy. Prozac tablet.
Trackbacks from: