Blown To Bits

Freedom of Texting

Friday, April 11th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Medical buy erythromycin online professionals may only be able to detect the blood under atrovent for sale a microscope (known as microscopic hematuria), or it may be sale buy get visible to the naked eye (known as gross hematuria). People cafergot should contact a doctor if they experience any symptoms that viagra from india can relate to bladder cancer, such as blood in the low price online urine, changes in urinary habits, pelvic pain, back pain, fatigue, bentyl prescription or unexplained weight loss. However, other conditions can also cause buy cheap tizanidine hematuria, such as benign tumors or other medical conditions. People diclofenac for sale with IC may have increased frequency and urgency of urination aldactone uk compared with people who do not have IC. The Urology order buy lowest price dosage Care Foundation states that although pain is a common symptom, buy overdose online purchase free is it possible to have IC without pain. IC causes an.

If you use your phone to talk about how bad your phone company is, could the phone company cut off your service?

The answer, believe it or not, seems to be, “It depends.” If you are merely talking on the phone, then no, the phone company has to let you do it. But if you are texting, the answer seems to be yes, your service could legally be terminated.

The reason this gets tricky even to explain is that there really is no such thing as a phone company any more. Verizon, which absorbed my old land line company, sells video services. Comcast, which used to be my cable TV company, now provides my residential “land line” service.

“Common carrier” laws have applied in the past to railroads (they couldn’t pick and choose among passengers; anyone with the money to buy a ticket is equally entitled to a seat) and to telephones (so phone companies couldn’t pick and choose their customers on political grounds, for example). As discussed in Blown to Bits, Verizon denied Naral Pro-Choice America the opportunity to create a text messaging group on the basis that it might be used for ‘controversial’ messages. It backed down on the case but not on its legal right to discriminate as it chose.

The FCC is now accepting comments on how text messaging should be treated in the code, like telephoning, where the service provider can’t control what the customers say, or like broadcasting, where the people who own the antenna get editorial control over what gets said. If you think this is a ridiculous no-brainer, you’re mistaken. It’s a real battle and the FCC needs to hear from as many people as possible.

The easiest thing to do is to go to the webform on the Public Knowledge site and to fill it out. PK also has a great deal more information about the issue. There is only a short window of opportunity; please act!

Comments are closed.