Blown To Bits

Freedom of Texting

Friday, April 11th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Shallow, generic buy withdrawal rapid breathing is a symptom of asthma that requires immediate lasix online without a prescription treatment, often due to constricted airways and difficulty getting oxygen order discount clonidine online into the lungs. There are several conditions that can mimic buy alesse (ovral l) online asthma symptoms and that people mistake for the condition. Any levitra for sale condition that can lead to partial obstruction or narrowing of retin-a prescription a person's airways can cause wheezing. For example, bronchodilators, such synthroid generic order as albuterol, relax the muscles surrounding the airways and open atarax internet them up. A person should also speak with a doctor find discount for to make sure it is safe to consume caffeine if cheap bentyl in canada they are taking any medications. Therefore, it is best to colchicine pill speak with a doctor who can provide an accurate diagnosis buy advair of the underlying cause of the wheezing. The researchers note 60 discount that extremes of both hot and cold temperatures could be viagra prescription potential asthma triggers. The American Lung Association (ALA) notes that generic viagra online the sooner a person starts treatment for asthma, the less damage.

If you use your phone to talk about how bad your phone company is, could the phone company cut off your service?

The answer, believe it or not, seems to be, “It depends.” If you are merely talking on the phone, then no, the phone company has to let you do it. But if you are texting, the answer seems to be yes, your service could legally be terminated.

The reason this gets tricky even to explain is that there really is no such thing as a phone company any more. Verizon, which absorbed my old land line company, sells video services. Comcast, which used to be my cable TV company, now provides my residential “land line” service.

“Common carrier” laws have applied in the past to railroads (they couldn’t pick and choose among passengers; anyone with the money to buy a ticket is equally entitled to a seat) and to telephones (so phone companies couldn’t pick and choose their customers on political grounds, for example). As discussed in Blown to Bits, Verizon denied Naral Pro-Choice America the opportunity to create a text messaging group on the basis that it might be used for ‘controversial’ messages. It backed down on the case but not on its legal right to discriminate as it chose.

The FCC is now accepting comments on how text messaging should be treated in the code, like telephoning, where the service provider can’t control what the customers say, or like broadcasting, where the people who own the antenna get editorial control over what gets said. If you think this is a ridiculous no-brainer, you’re mistaken. It’s a real battle and the FCC needs to hear from as many people as possible.

The easiest thing to do is to go to the webform on the Public Knowledge site and to fill it out. PK also has a great deal more information about the issue. There is only a short window of opportunity; please act!

Comments are closed.