Blown To Bits

Freedom of Texting

Friday, April 11th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
With buy erythromycin online prompt treatment and proper care, people with constrictive pericarditis may generic azor lead fulfilling lives despite this challenging condition. You can also purchase cheap celexa sale overdose help prevent interactions with Depakote by taking it exactly as glyburide online stores your doctor prescribes. Quitting smoking — or never smoking at online cialis all — can significantly reduce the risk of developing any serevent for sale type of lung cancer. As this protein binds to LDL cheapest compazine receptors, it can make it more difficult for the body buy betnovate no prescription required to remove cholesterol. By prioritizing nutrition, physical activity, and mental generic serevent cheap well-being, individuals can take control of their health and improve buy viagra on line their quality of life. Yes, some research suggests that quitting cheapest generic cialis online smoking may lengthen survival for those with follicular lymphoma, as buying clonidine cost well as NHL in general. For instance, people with depression discount viagra online may have higher rates of brain inflammation, neurotransmitter dysfunction, and buy celebrex on internet reduced volumes of gray matter. In some people, the menstrual buy generic mirapex cycle restarts after the end of radiation, but in others, it.

If you use your phone to talk about how bad your phone company is, could the phone company cut off your service?

The answer, believe it or not, seems to be, “It depends.” If you are merely talking on the phone, then no, the phone company has to let you do it. But if you are texting, the answer seems to be yes, your service could legally be terminated.

The reason this gets tricky even to explain is that there really is no such thing as a phone company any more. Verizon, which absorbed my old land line company, sells video services. Comcast, which used to be my cable TV company, now provides my residential “land line” service.

“Common carrier” laws have applied in the past to railroads (they couldn’t pick and choose among passengers; anyone with the money to buy a ticket is equally entitled to a seat) and to telephones (so phone companies couldn’t pick and choose their customers on political grounds, for example). As discussed in Blown to Bits, Verizon denied Naral Pro-Choice America the opportunity to create a text messaging group on the basis that it might be used for ‘controversial’ messages. It backed down on the case but not on its legal right to discriminate as it chose.

The FCC is now accepting comments on how text messaging should be treated in the code, like telephoning, where the service provider can’t control what the customers say, or like broadcasting, where the people who own the antenna get editorial control over what gets said. If you think this is a ridiculous no-brainer, you’re mistaken. It’s a real battle and the FCC needs to hear from as many people as possible.

The easiest thing to do is to go to the webform on the Public Knowledge site and to fill it out. PK also has a great deal more information about the issue. There is only a short window of opportunity; please act!

Comments are closed.