Blown To Bits

Freedom of Texting

Friday, April 11th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
The advair online sale absence of warnings or other information for a given drug get cheapest quinine low price canada does not indicate that the drug or drug combination is sale azor get safe, effective, or appropriate for all patients or all specific viagra pharmacy uses. Doctors have settled on calling the possibility of blood order cheap serevent sale dosage clots related to vaccination by the two adenovirus vector vaccines cheap augmentin a risk factor or a rare complication of VITT, rather buy cheap triamterene than a cause. Likewise, if they have been trying to buy viagra canada conceive without success, they can contact a doctor to discuss order discount levitra online effects possible fertility treatment options. Topical steroids can help treat allergic buy estrace lowest price contact dermatitis that affects only a small area of the viagra tablet body. You should always consult your doctor or another healthcare purchase colchicine online professional before taking any medication. "I don't think there is viagra no rx required enough data to make a permanent change in recommendations; however, order cialis in us telling patients that early in the day exercise seems to be.

If you use your phone to talk about how bad your phone company is, could the phone company cut off your service?

The answer, believe it or not, seems to be, “It depends.” If you are merely talking on the phone, then no, the phone company has to let you do it. But if you are texting, the answer seems to be yes, your service could legally be terminated.

The reason this gets tricky even to explain is that there really is no such thing as a phone company any more. Verizon, which absorbed my old land line company, sells video services. Comcast, which used to be my cable TV company, now provides my residential “land line” service.

“Common carrier” laws have applied in the past to railroads (they couldn’t pick and choose among passengers; anyone with the money to buy a ticket is equally entitled to a seat) and to telephones (so phone companies couldn’t pick and choose their customers on political grounds, for example). As discussed in Blown to Bits, Verizon denied Naral Pro-Choice America the opportunity to create a text messaging group on the basis that it might be used for ‘controversial’ messages. It backed down on the case but not on its legal right to discriminate as it chose.

The FCC is now accepting comments on how text messaging should be treated in the code, like telephoning, where the service provider can’t control what the customers say, or like broadcasting, where the people who own the antenna get editorial control over what gets said. If you think this is a ridiculous no-brainer, you’re mistaken. It’s a real battle and the FCC needs to hear from as many people as possible.

The easiest thing to do is to go to the webform on the Public Knowledge site and to fill it out. PK also has a great deal more information about the issue. There is only a short window of opportunity; please act!

Comments are closed.