Blown To Bits

Google is #1

Tuesday, April 22nd, 2008 by Harry Lewis
There discount cephalexin online are no specific reports of lab tests interacting with Calquence order aldactone in us oral capsules or oral tablets. You can also help prevent buy online interactions with Calquence by taking it exactly as your doctor get find alternatives store prescribes. The absence of warnings or other information for a cialis purchase given drug does not indicate that the drug or drug spiriva sale combination is safe, effective, or appropriate for all patients or canadian methotrexate all specific uses. Bone marrow transplants, also known as hematopoietic without cialis get prescription discount stem cell transplantation (HSCT), play a significant role in treating order triamterene in us AML. Various factors, including genetics, age, response to treatment, and ampicillin for sale overall health, influence AML survival rates. Anyone can experience side cheapest cipro effects during AML treatment, but certain factors can make them cheapest cipro more likely. But doctors can recommend ways to reduce or generic allopurinol cheap manage these effects, such as by taking additional medication or atrovent without prescription changing a person's treatment plan. During a blood transfusion, a healthcare.

Google is the #1 brand in the world, according a Millward Brown report, Top 100 Most Powerful Brands ‘08. The ranking formula multiplies “Intangible earnings” by “Portion of intangible earnings attributable to brand” by “Brand earnings multiple.” Others will have to judge whether these three factors are the right ones, whether their values can be determined meaningfully, and whether that is the right way to combine them. I am a bit skeptical. The #2 brand? GE. #3 is Microsoft, #4 is Coca-Cola, and #5 is China Mobile.

If Google is the #1 brand—and that does feel right, whatever calculation produced the result—the implication is astonishing. The top brand in the world is one that almost no one had heard of a decade ago. The earliest reference I could find to “Google” in a search of newspaper archives was a May 31, 1998 column by Bradley Peniston in the Annapolis, MD Capital, entitled “Yahoo for new search engine.” (That’s leaving out all the articles about the Barney Google comic strip.) A week later, in his next column, Peniston had to explain where to find Google—on the Stanford web site!

Comments are closed.