This generic buy prescription professional water loss refers to the amount of water that passes pharmacy viagra through the epidermis, a layer in the skin, and evaporates buy approved on the skin's surface. As people age, their skin changes discount arcoxia no rx as it loses structural proteins, such as collagen, elastin, and order generic cialis prescription and alcohol keratin. Topical ceramides typically work well for most skin types, ampicillin pharmacy are safe for most people, and are not likely to purchase betnovate online cause side effects. Ceramides may appear as ceramide AP, ceramide prozac EOP, ceramide NG, ceramide NP, ceramide NS, and phytosphingosine, in buy asacol online the ingredients list of over the counter products. During a buy generic diovan thread lift, the cosmetic surgeon uses a temporary suture, or free buy "thread," to lift up portions of the skin. This means approved lasix pharmacy a thread lift is a good option for people with buy atarax lowest price certain conditions that may make them ineligible for surgery under a.

This gentleman unwisely posted¬†some photos of himself waving a $20 bills as part of a Craigslist ad, and now believes that copyright law, as well as criminal fraud statutes, will come to his aid in encouraging Gawker to take them down. Gawker doesn’t seem to agree.

What’s interesting here is the gentleman’s confusion between public and private spaces, the conceit that the photos he posted on Craigslist were still “his” to control. Theoretically, Craigslist might have an argument with Gawker, since the Craigslist¬†terms of service state, “You ‚Ķ agree not to reproduce, duplicate or copy Content from the Service without the express written¬†consent of craigslist.” As a practical matter, Gawker is right: “Craigslist is a public place.”

Also interesting are the gentleman’s threats of legal action to respond to what might kindly be called a personal misjudgment. What people think might be done about the problems they have created for themselves has changed, not only with the litigiousness of society in general, but with the litigiousness about bits in particular. Before the RIAA and the MPAA started going after teenagers for music downloading, people like this might never even have heard of copyright law, much less have thought (however mistakenly) that it could protect their reputation. Another thing for which the recording industries can be thanked, I suppose.

This entry was posted on Thursday, May 22nd, 2008 at 12:55 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.