Treatment clozapine no prescription for both conditions involves lifestyle changes and medications that block buy serevent from canada acid production. In a medical context, disability refers to symptoms lowest price viagra that interfere with a person's ability to do typical activities. prozac cheap price A doctor collects information about the symptoms a person is buy lipitor without prescription experiencing and orders the necessary tests. They will also measure order amikacin the person's height and weight to ensure it is safe buy viagra without prescription to perform the procedure. ACCESSIBLE DRUG LABELS AND CONTAINERSSome pharmacies buy generic xalatan cost oral offer labels with large print, braille, or a code you advair online scan with a smartphone to convert text to speech. A generic zyprexa person with underlying bipolar disorder may also have pronounced seasonal viagra in australia patterns of manic and depressive episodes. The frequent need to wake.

This gentleman unwisely posted¬†some photos of himself waving a $20 bills as part of a Craigslist ad, and now believes that copyright law, as well as criminal fraud statutes, will come to his aid in encouraging Gawker to take them down. Gawker doesn’t seem to agree.

What’s interesting here is the gentleman’s confusion between public and private spaces, the conceit that the photos he posted on Craigslist were still “his” to control. Theoretically, Craigslist might have an argument with Gawker, since the Craigslist¬†terms of service state, “You ‚Ķ agree not to reproduce, duplicate or copy Content from the Service without the express written¬†consent of craigslist.” As a practical matter, Gawker is right: “Craigslist is a public place.”

Also interesting are the gentleman’s threats of legal action to respond to what might kindly be called a personal misjudgment. What people think might be done about the problems they have created for themselves has changed, not only with the litigiousness of society in general, but with the litigiousness about bits in particular. Before the RIAA and the MPAA started going after teenagers for music downloading, people like this might never even have heard of copyright law, much less have thought (however mistakenly) that it could protect their reputation. Another thing for which the recording industries can be thanked, I suppose.

This entry was posted on Thursday, May 22nd, 2008 at 12:55 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.