However, purchase cheapest bentyl price tablet some research suggests that chronic inflammation due to psoriasis may certified estrace contribute to the development of comorbidities, including lymphoma. According to cheap viagra no rx the American Academy of Dermatology Association (AAD), early signs of lumigan without prescription PsA may include swollen and stiff joints. Most people with cialis malaysia healthy immune systems can get enough protection from a single amoxicillin order course of vaccine shots. Some people may be hesitant about buy order lowest price receiving any vaccine despite the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, low price cialis including the hepatitis B vaccine. People may benefit from talking order colchicine with a qualified healthcare professional about their hepatitis B immune cheapest generic bentyl online status, whether they are protected, and what they can do cheapest cipro next. The liver produces CRP during an inflammatory process, meaning buy augmentin a higher amount is likely because inflammation is present in the.

This gentleman unwisely posted¬†some photos of himself waving a $20 bills as part of a Craigslist ad, and now believes that copyright law, as well as criminal fraud statutes, will come to his aid in encouraging Gawker to take them down. Gawker doesn’t seem to agree.

What’s interesting here is the gentleman’s confusion between public and private spaces, the conceit that the photos he posted on Craigslist were still “his” to control. Theoretically, Craigslist might have an argument with Gawker, since the Craigslist¬†terms of service state, “You ‚Ķ agree not to reproduce, duplicate or copy Content from the Service without the express written¬†consent of craigslist.” As a practical matter, Gawker is right: “Craigslist is a public place.”

Also interesting are the gentleman’s threats of legal action to respond to what might kindly be called a personal misjudgment. What people think might be done about the problems they have created for themselves has changed, not only with the litigiousness of society in general, but with the litigiousness about bits in particular. Before the RIAA and the MPAA started going after teenagers for music downloading, people like this might never even have heard of copyright law, much less have thought (however mistakenly) that it could protect their reputation. Another thing for which the recording industries can be thanked, I suppose.

This entry was posted on Thursday, May 22nd, 2008 at 12:55 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.