For viagra drug more details about the dosage of Abilify Maintena and Abilify free cialis online order Asimtufii, see the "Abilify Maintena and Abilify Asimtufii dosing" section ampicillin rx below. There is little risk to those who donate because cheapest generic cialis online they generate new bone marrow to replace removed bone marrow. pharmacy norvasc A person may also need additional medications to manage symptoms viagra in australia such as erectile dysfunction, fatigue, depression, or mood changes. Manicures cost viagra with harsh chemicals or rough files can be damaging to order diflucan online nails, particularly when a person chooses artificial, acrylic, or gel flagyl without prescription nails. If you and your doctor agree to continue Verquvo buy cheapest viagra no prescription treatment during pregnancy, consider enrolling in the drug's pregnancy registry. where to order clonidine However, doctors will usually need to examine other symptoms and buy cialis cheap carry out tests to determine why a person's throat is cost cephalexin hurting. However, people will need to attend follow-up care appointments order discount cialis online in case their cancer recurs or new tumors develop. However, discount robaxin online research has shown that drinking heavily, especially chronically, can reduce testosterone.

This gentleman unwisely posted¬†some photos of himself waving a $20 bills as part of a Craigslist ad, and now believes that copyright law, as well as criminal fraud statutes, will come to his aid in encouraging Gawker to take them down. Gawker doesn’t seem to agree.

What’s interesting here is the gentleman’s confusion between public and private spaces, the conceit that the photos he posted on Craigslist were still “his” to control. Theoretically, Craigslist might have an argument with Gawker, since the Craigslist¬†terms of service state, “You ‚Ķ agree not to reproduce, duplicate or copy Content from the Service without the express written¬†consent of craigslist.” As a practical matter, Gawker is right: “Craigslist is a public place.”

Also interesting are the gentleman’s threats of legal action to respond to what might kindly be called a personal misjudgment. What people think might be done about the problems they have created for themselves has changed, not only with the litigiousness of society in general, but with the litigiousness about bits in particular. Before the RIAA and the MPAA started going after teenagers for music downloading, people like this might never even have heard of copyright law, much less have thought (however mistakenly) that it could protect their reputation. Another thing for which the recording industries can be thanked, I suppose.

This entry was posted on Thursday, May 22nd, 2008 at 12:55 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.