Before find discount buy engaging in sexual intercourse, a person with CF can use tetracycline for sale a short-acting bronchodilator and perform airway clearance therapies. People may buy mirapex online also want to connect with others with CF through online order prescription lowest dosage cheapest price communities, social media networks, and virtual support groups. CPCs may buy atrovent give people the impression that they are medical clinics or buy cheap tizanidine have medical expertise even though they do not provide a ventolin without prescription full range of reproductive healthcare. The AMA Journal of Ethics purchase free order low price australia states that providing misleading or inaccurate health information violates ethical buy zyprexa principles in medicine because it does not consider the patient's betnovate sale free pharmacy well-being. They may hinder or delay pregnant people from accessing timely.

Harvard’s University Librarian, Robert Darnton, has a good piece in the New York Review of Books on the future of research libraries. It begins, “Information is exploding so furiously around us and information technology is changing at such bewildering speed that we face a fundamental problem: How to orient ourselves in the new landscape? What, for example, will become of research libraries in the face of technological marvels such as Google?”

Nice metaphor, Professor Darnton! (Full disclosure: We were far from the first to use it. “Information Explosion” is the title of a paper by Latanya Sweeney, and the image surely wasn’t original with her either.)

While we’re at it, a tip of the hat to my colleague Stuart Shieber, the architect of Harvard’s open-access policy for research papers. He’s just been named head of Harvard’s newly created Office of Scholarly Communications.

This entry was posted on Saturday, May 24th, 2008 at 12:43 pm and is filed under Open Access. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.