Blown To Bits

Surveillance, Green and Corporate

Tuesday, May 27th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
However, quinine sale when trying these, it is important to ensure the consistency buy cheap methotrexate is runny enough to swallow them easily, as some nut atrovent butters can be very thick. If you develop a side clonidine no prescription effect while taking Seroquel and want to tell the FDA where to buy viagra about it, visit MedWatch. Laser cataract surgery involves using a methotrexate information laser to make the incisions into the eye and help cheap prednisolone pharmacy break the cataract up. These improvements tended to be less cheapest zithromax online common in those with long lasting leg pain and in buying azor people who believed the sciatica would last a long time. buy cialis online without prescription If a drug requires prior authorization but you start treatment purchase cheap lasix sale dangers without the prior approval, you could pay the full cost cafergot sale of the medication. For example, if a person has a very.

Sara Rimer has a nice piece in the Memorial Day New York Times about sustainability houses on college campuses‚Äìresidences where students time their showers, use the drained water to flush their toilets, and so on. Some reported behaviors, such as not bathing at all for extended periods, remind me of ’60s naturalism. Other activities are timelessly collegiate, and unlikely to last a day beyond graduation‚Äìsuch as plastering a picture of John Edwards to the shower stall ceiling as an encouragement to shorter showers.

But one sentence in this story is strikingly modern. “By¬†next fall, the house‚Äôs 24-hour energy-use monitoring system will be fully up and running. Every turn of the faucet, every switch of a light, will be recorded, room by room.”

‚ÄúIt‚Äôs not about telling people, ‚ÄòYou have to do this, you have to do that,‚Äô¬†‚Äù explains one of the students. Not today, at least. I’m betting that the monitoring technology will become more widespread and more coercive‚Äìperhaps not through direct government surveillance, but through economic incentives and social pressures. And all the standard problems with bits will arise with that information about faucet turns and light-switch-flips: who has access to the data, what will it be used for, is it deidentified, will it leak?

Today’s New York Times has a lovely account of corporate surveillance that gives a flavor of the sort of thing that can go wrong. Deutsche Telekom, a large German phone service provider, irritated by repeated leaks about layoff plans, decided to use the data at its disposal to figure out if the leaks were coming from its board of directors. So it turned a lot of call records from 2005 and 2006 over to a third party to check for conversations between directors and reporters. (You may recall that almost exactly the same thing happened at HP not long ago.) Happily, the Germans seem not to be taking this privacy violation lightly. But it’s another example of a general fact about bits: Once they are collected for one reason (in this case, billing, or perhaps traffic analysis), it’s easy to hang onto them just in case they might come in handy later. With the passage of time, the odds go up that someone with access to the data will hatch a bright new idea about how to use it.

Comments are closed.