The buy nasonex online main reason for this is that treatment for testicular cancer order betnovate online is highly effective, even in the later stages of the buy generic robaxin condition. Genetic testing through a simple blood or saliva test purchase viagra no rx can provide insight into disease risk for people with hypertrophic cafergot medicine cardiomyopathy (HCM) or a family history of the condition. This buy free lipitor best price jelly is not a complete list — it is important for cialis alternative people to inform a doctor about all medications, including supplements order cialis no rx or illegal drugs. They often involve loosely structured, moderator-led sessions order natural diclofenac no prescription where people exchange experiences and ideas. However, in some cases, store get generic without zithromax prescription these changes to the immune system can benefit the host buy viagra us by reducing overall inflammation. If people with MS experience symptoms glucophage without prescription of cognitive changes or have concerns about cognitive dysfunction, they viagra generic can contact a doctor. In some cases, practitioners with more experience,.

Sara Rimer has a nice piece in the Memorial Day New York Times about sustainability houses on college campuses‚Äìresidences where students time their showers, use the drained water to flush their toilets, and so on. Some reported behaviors, such as not bathing at all for extended periods, remind me of ’60s naturalism. Other activities are timelessly collegiate, and unlikely to last a day beyond graduation‚Äìsuch as plastering a picture of John Edwards to the shower stall ceiling as an encouragement to shorter showers.

But one sentence in this story is strikingly modern. “By¬†next fall, the house‚Äôs 24-hour energy-use monitoring system will be fully up and running. Every turn of the faucet, every switch of a light, will be recorded, room by room.”

‚ÄúIt‚Äôs not about telling people, ‚ÄòYou have to do this, you have to do that,‚Äô¬†‚Äù explains one of the students. Not today, at least. I’m betting that the monitoring technology will become more widespread and more coercive‚Äìperhaps not through direct government surveillance, but through economic incentives and social pressures. And all the standard problems with bits will arise with that information about faucet turns and light-switch-flips: who has access to the data, what will it be used for, is it deidentified, will it leak?

Today’s New York Times has a lovely account of corporate surveillance that gives a flavor of the sort of thing that can go wrong. Deutsche Telekom, a large German phone service provider, irritated by repeated leaks about layoff plans, decided to use the data at its disposal to figure out if the leaks were coming from its board of directors. So it turned a lot of call records from 2005 and 2006 over to a third party to check for conversations between directors and reporters. (You may recall that almost exactly the same thing happened at HP not long ago.) Happily, the Germans seem not to be taking this privacy violation lightly. But it’s another example of a general fact about bits: Once they are collected for one reason (in this case, billing, or perhaps traffic analysis), it’s easy to hang onto them just in case they might come in handy later. With the passage of time, the odds go up that someone with access to the data will hatch a bright new idea about how to use it.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 27th, 2008 at 10:21 am and is filed under Surveillance. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.