The discount diclofenac drug information contained herein is subject to change and is buy generic vibramycin not intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, order cheap remeron sale dosage drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects. The American Thoracic generic celebrex sale dangers Society states that people can try several alternative or complementary buy ventolin pills therapies for COPD. You may wonder whether Topamax or Botox order amoxicillin is more effective for helping to prevent migraine headaches. Therefore, cheap xalatan pill it is important for a healthcare professional to examine the buy methotrexate us atypical cells and check for signs of cancer. Plan on synthroid sale free pharmacy wearing clothing that will protect the treated area of skin viagra free delivery from excessive sun exposure when leaving the office. Traditional medicine buy generic diclofenac cost oral uses feverfew as a treatment for various conditions, including headaches, toradol for order fever, and menstrual cramps. Subjective means the evidence derives from buy cheap estrace alternative the participants' perspective rather than measurable objective evidence. These medications cafergot aim to treat symptoms of psychosis, a form of mental illness.

Now that’s a dog-bites-man headline, but the votes in question are the votes that validated the unconstitutional government wiretapping under FISA discussed in earlier posts (here, here, and here). Now it turns out, thanks to excellent research by Maplight.org, that House members who favored immunity for the telcos received on average more than twice as much in telco contributions than those who voted no. Democrats who switched their votes in order to relieve the telcos of responsibility for the wiretaps received 68% more than those who voted against immunity twice.

One of the themes of Chapter 8 of Blown to Bits is the importance of the political contributions by entrenched interests, major communications corporations in particular, on freedom of information as the technology makes an open society more feasible. These numbers dramatically show the extent to which Congresspeople will act against the public interest broadly and the civil rights of individuals in order to raise the money needed for their re-election campaigns. It must be pretty demoralizing for the honorable ones among our elected representatives.

This entry was posted on Friday, June 27th, 2008 at 9:49 pm and is filed under Miscellaneous. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.