Additionally, zithromax from canada many Eastern medicine practices do not undergo regulation, and there purchase cheap cialis low cost consultation is limited evidence from clinical trials regarding their effectiveness. Healthcare buying cheapest amoxicillin effects professionals need to be aware of any implicit biases they colchicine sale may have and work to remove them. Many of the viagra pill treatment options developed have been learned from treating patients with discount amikacin cystic fibrosis. However, there are ways that people with OA order clozapine can exercise, which is the next aspect of patient education. lumigan When the endoscope is in this area, a healthcare professional ampicillin online stores can see where the common bile duct empties into the betnovate order small intestine, which they call the ampulla of Vater. When cheap glyburide a person has emphysema, the walls between many of the find no rx viagra alveoli are damaged, causing the alveoli themselves to lose their viagra online sales shape and become floppy. A reduction in estrogen causes a order cheap serevent higher rate of bone cell turnover, which results in bone buy generic griseofulvin no prescription usa loss over time. If a doctor suspects PBA and a person.

Vontu, Tablus, Code Green, PacketSure, — these are all players in the world of “data security,” of making sure that valuable, confidential, protected, secure data doesn’t leak out. It’s a noble calling. After all, we don’t want our private information leaking everywhere, and corporations, for sure, don’t want theirs sneaking out the back door either.

Here’s what they do. They listen to everything passing through the company network. Often, they sit in a place on the network where information heads out the digital door to the Internet. They are “configurable.” That means that, like much of the software we use, the administrator can set up rules. “If Susan Black sends an email that includes the word ‘Prada’ or ‘Tiffany’ then …” Oh wait, that isn’t exactly the kind of rule you would expect for data security. My point exactly.

The tools that guard against data leaks are nothing more or less than digital wiretaps. The marketing term is “content inspection agents.” I love marketing-speak. The folks in marketing could have just named them “eavesdroppers.” Unlike the wiretaps of old, they don’t require a human listener. They have digital listeners; software that can be configured to detect whatever the administrator might think is suspicious, and then take appropriate action. That action might be as severe as blocking the transmission, or as aparently benign as keeping a copy for administrative review. The tools can look at every form of network traffic, because they operate at the deepest level, inspecting all the bits as they pass by.

Like so many innovations in our digital world, things developed for one purpose can be directed, or mis-directed to another. So it is with these tools. Guarding against data leaks is like protecting the homeland from terrorists. No one would ever argue against it. The question is, which of our assumptions about personal privacy are being sacrificed along the way. Our observation is that, for the most part, we don’t care. The more we know about the world of bits, the more we will come to accept that Big Brother is watching and listening, and we will just have to accept that new reality.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 11th, 2008 at 9:10 am and is filed under Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.