Blown To Bits

Data Protection or Wiretaps?

Wednesday, June 11th, 2008 by Ken Ledeen
The cheap viagra in usa researchers reported that both types of illness were associated with buy discount cialis online a range of long-term symptoms and decreased health-related quality of celebrex without prescription life. It is common for people to experience symptoms such buy remeron online australia as tiredness, headaches, and body pain when they are stressed. find discount cipro Some ADHD traits, such as being talkative, energetic, or adventurous, buy toradol online cheap may make it easier to make friends. SPEP is a buy amoxicillin no prescription sample test doctors use to measure antibodies in the blood and cheap cialis in usa locate the atypical monoclonal antibody that myeloma cells produce. Many order remeron products have additional ingredients that caregivers should be aware of, atenolol side effects including sugars, colors, flavors, and preservatives. The Centers for Disease buy flovent generic Control and Prevention (CDC) state that a person should not toradol for sale receive it if they have had an allergic reaction to buy generic clomid problems any ingredient in previous doses. It is worth noting that buy artane online intimacy does not only apply to romantic relationships but to order natural estrace no prescription relationships in general, including those between best friends and family members..

Vontu, Tablus, Code Green, PacketSure, — these are all players in the world of “data security,” of making sure that valuable, confidential, protected, secure data doesn’t leak out. It’s a noble calling. After all, we don’t want our private information leaking everywhere, and corporations, for sure, don’t want theirs sneaking out the back door either.

Here’s what they do. They listen to everything passing through the company network. Often, they sit in a place on the network where information heads out the digital door to the Internet. They are “configurable.” That means that, like much of the software we use, the administrator can set up rules. “If Susan Black sends an email that includes the word ‘Prada’ or ‘Tiffany’ then …” Oh wait, that isn’t exactly the kind of rule you would expect for data security. My point exactly.

The tools that guard against data leaks are nothing more or less than digital wiretaps. The marketing term is “content inspection agents.” I love marketing-speak. The folks in marketing could have just named them “eavesdroppers.” Unlike the wiretaps of old, they don’t require a human listener. They have digital listeners; software that can be configured to detect whatever the administrator might think is suspicious, and then take appropriate action. That action might be as severe as blocking the transmission, or as aparently benign as keeping a copy for administrative review. The tools can look at every form of network traffic, because they operate at the deepest level, inspecting all the bits as they pass by.

Like so many innovations in our digital world, things developed for one purpose can be directed, or mis-directed to another. So it is with these tools. Guarding against data leaks is like protecting the homeland from terrorists. No one would ever argue against it. The question is, which of our assumptions about personal privacy are being sacrificed along the way. Our observation is that, for the most part, we don’t care. The more we know about the world of bits, the more we will come to accept that Big Brother is watching and listening, and we will just have to accept that new reality.

Comments are closed.