While buy diclofenac online it is not possible to completely eliminate the risk of cheap erythromycin internet cancer, understanding how cells work and how cancer develops and order zithromax cheap online taking steps to prevent it can give a person more find griseofulvin on internet control over their health. Lack of professional guidance and treatment petcam (metacam) oral suspension prescription from healthcare professionals is one of the major roadblocks for glyburide online millions of people suffering from these common debilitating symptoms." Managing cialis without rx lupus symptoms that negatively affect quality of life and treating griseofulvin for sale depression via psychotherapy or medication can help. Some RA treatments, clonidine no prescription such as corticosteroids, may also increase the risk of complications, order free ampicillin alternative withdrawal including osteoporosis and osteopenia. HPV infection causes most cases of cost cialis cervical cancer, and HPV can pass between people through sexual contact..

The House passed the revised and extended Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and the Senate is sure to follow suit next week. ArsTechnica has a good explanation of how the bill undercuts constitutional assurances that the government will not spy on its citizens. And also of why the guarantees that really, truly the government will play by the rules now are nothing more than was already present in the previous legislation and ignored by the the Bush administration.

Today’s news (see the Washington Post story) is that Obama will vote for this bill, while promising to watch its application if he becomes president.¬†

One of the things Obama stressed in his primary campaigns was that he voted against the war in Iraq, and that Clinton voted for it. Obama cast himself as the cautious one, the one prepared to say that the president’s say-so for going to war was not enough. Certainly, many who voted for the war did so out of fear that they would seem weak if Saddam Hussein really did have WMD’s; Clinton and others erred on the side of not being seen as risking the security of the nation, and Obama roundly criticized them for having done so.

Here Obama is doing the same thing. His reputation in military and defense matters being open to question because of his inexperience, he is trying to establish himself as a strong defender of national security. He apparently doesn’t need to court the civil libertarian voters, believing they have nowhere else to go.

It doesn’t look like this can be an issue for the debates, since McCain is planning to vote the same way. I wonder what Clinton’s plans are.

 

This entry was posted on Saturday, June 21st, 2008 at 10:24 pm and is filed under Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.