In order cheapest zyprexa dose contrast to natural opioids, synthetic opioids derive from chemicals that viagra sale people make in laboratories. You should always consult your doctor cheap clozapine tablets or another healthcare professional before taking any medication. Due to tablet cialis the rarity of HCT cancer, a lump in the neck cheap cialis samples is unlikely to be a symptom of this type of buying viagra online cancer. However, the efficacy of the HPV vaccine in protecting order cialis on internet against certain cancer types may cause confusion. During pregnancy, an buy celexa without prescription increase in estrogen and progesterone, increased blood flow in the find cheap viagra online body, and increased acidity in the mouth can all lead buy (metacam) on internet to oral changes. To diagnose IBS-D, healthcare professionals may take discount viagra online a full medical history, assess any symptoms, and carry out cheap azor a physical exam. To read detailed instructions about using Benlysta buy estrace sale prefilled syringes and autoinjectors, see this medication guide. It is recommended.

The House passed the revised and extended Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and the Senate is sure to follow suit next week. ArsTechnica has a good explanation of how the bill undercuts constitutional assurances that the government will not spy on its citizens. And also of why the guarantees that really, truly the government will play by the rules now are nothing more than was already present in the previous legislation and ignored by the the Bush administration.

Today’s news (see the Washington Post story) is that Obama will vote for this bill, while promising to watch its application if he becomes president.¬†

One of the things Obama stressed in his primary campaigns was that he voted against the war in Iraq, and that Clinton voted for it. Obama cast himself as the cautious one, the one prepared to say that the president’s say-so for going to war was not enough. Certainly, many who voted for the war did so out of fear that they would seem weak if Saddam Hussein really did have WMD’s; Clinton and others erred on the side of not being seen as risking the security of the nation, and Obama roundly criticized them for having done so.

Here Obama is doing the same thing. His reputation in military and defense matters being open to question because of his inexperience, he is trying to establish himself as a strong defender of national security. He apparently doesn’t need to court the civil libertarian voters, believing they have nowhere else to go.

It doesn’t look like this can be an issue for the debates, since McCain is planning to vote the same way. I wonder what Clinton’s plans are.

 

This entry was posted on Saturday, June 21st, 2008 at 10:24 pm and is filed under Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.