Privacy in the Boston Globe
Saturday, June 14th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
These find discount amikacin symptoms sometimes signal an underlying medical condition, so it is buy zithromax without prescription important to consult a doctor about any new or worsening cialis online review dementia symptoms. If this is difficult, try asking the person buy free clindamycin where they feel the most pain, or whether they feel buy generic celebrex a pulsating, tingling, or numb sensation anywhere. Make sure the buy cialis overnight delivery tourniquet is around a part of the limb that is buy cheap buy online canada between the source of bleeding and the heart. Once the amoxicillin online tourniquet is tight enough, secure the makeshift windlass by twisting cialis prescription a rubber band, hair tie, key ring, or piece of order cialis no prescription fabric around it so it remains in place. It involves side effects purchase estrace cheap various symptoms, such as gradual memory loss, changes in thinking, free buy online order behavior, language, and issues with planning and reasoning. The U.S Department.
I have a piece in the Boston Globe this morning about social networks and other threats to privacy. It’s the most e-mailed.
I didn’t pick or get consulted on the title; that’s generally the rule for these opinion pieces. I’m a bit sorry that it comes out as picking on Facebook, which is merely the most successful and probably no worse on privacy matters than many other sites. As a title for this piece about the privacy wars, I might have chosen instead Pogo’s classic wisdom, “We have met the enemy, and he is us.”