Privacy in the Boston Globe
Saturday, June 14th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Another buy generic serevent autoimmune disease called secondary Sjögren disease frequently occurs in individuals buy artane from india with SLE. A support group may help people cope with buy cheap erythromycin the psychological stress of living with this chronic condition. People buy cheap ampicillin online with bulimia have a heightened risk of severe esophageal complications, cheapest bentyl such as rupture of the esophagus, although it is rare. compazine no prescription Speaking with spiritual leaders or mentors can also provide support accutane prescription and put a person on the right track for overcoming spiriva no prescription it. For those in the transgender community or those who order cheap advair sale dosage experience gender dysphoria, these procedures can both impact their appearance order clonidine and mental health. As a result, it is necessary to order cheap ventolin interpret in vitro data with caution, as these results do order glucophage no prescription not necessarily predict the reaction of an entire living being. The.
I have a piece in the Boston Globe this morning about social networks and other threats to privacy. It’s the most e-mailed.
I didn’t pick or get consulted on the title; that’s generally the rule for these opinion pieces. I’m a bit sorry that it comes out as picking on Facebook, which is merely the most successful and probably no worse on privacy matters than many other sites. As a title for this piece about the privacy wars, I might have chosen instead Pogo’s classic wisdom, “We have met the enemy, and he is us.”