Privacy in the Boston Globe
Saturday, June 14th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
It buy purchase is important for a person's body position to remain the triamterene sale same each time they check their blood pressure in order cheap online review to make sure results are not affected by changes in cheap clonidine position. Healthcare professionals frequently order blood tests for various reasons, cheap online no rx such as monitoring health status, checking for infection, and helping buy estrace vaginal cream online to diagnose various conditions. Private technical schools, community colleges, and erythromycin for sale adult education programs may offer phlebotomy education. To discover more generic flovent evidence-based information and resources for donating blood, visit our dedicated buy estradiol valerate hub. In contrast, those with homozygous HH have two copies toradol india of a gene that causes hemochromatosis, one from each parent. buy generic ampicillin There are several different types of HH gene a person can.
I have a piece in the Boston Globe this morning about social networks and other threats to privacy. It’s the most e-mailed.
I didn’t pick or get consulted on the title; that’s generally the rule for these opinion pieces. I’m a bit sorry that it comes out as picking on Facebook, which is merely the most successful and probably no worse on privacy matters than many other sites. As a title for this piece about the privacy wars, I might have chosen instead Pogo’s classic wisdom, “We have met the enemy, and he is us.”