Privacy in the Boston Globe
Saturday, June 14th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Hypertension discount asacol can damage the small blood vessels inside the kidneys, preventing 60 sale these organs from functioning properly. These underlying conditions can contribute low price zyprexa to nerve damage and disrupt the typical sensory perceptions of sale discount prednisolone pain and joint injury. The microbiome is a collection of nasonex professional good and potentially harmful bacteria in a particular environment. The purchase serevent no rx drug information contained herein is subject to change and is cialis buy drug not intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, buy generic atrovent drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects. The number of drops canada participants, the length of the original study, and many other lipitor from india factors can make it hard to compare the findings of two.
I have a piece in the Boston Globe this morning about social networks and other threats to privacy. It’s the most e-mailed.
I didn’t pick or get consulted on the title; that’s generally the rule for these opinion pieces. I’m a bit sorry that it comes out as picking on Facebook, which is merely the most successful and probably no worse on privacy matters than many other sites. As a title for this piece about the privacy wars, I might have chosen instead Pogo’s classic wisdom, “We have met the enemy, and he is us.”