However, discount viagra no rx online customer reviews may not be as reliable as other buy estrace online types of resources, such as the patient information medication guide cheap atarax from uk provided by the drug manufacturer. Additionally, long-term use of corticosteroids buy generic tizanidine can lead to eye problems such as glaucoma or cataracts. for lowest uk cost get cheapest Common withdrawal symptoms of oral corticosteroids may include joint and discount gentamicin eye drops muscle pain, adrenal insufficiency, or depression. What you can doTaking online uk Symbicort exactly as prescribed is one of the best ways canadian cialis to reduce your risk of heart-related side effects. Symptoms of buy ampicillin online oral thrush can include white spots in your mouth, loss buy cheap discount alternative of taste, mouth pain, sores on the inside of your buy dexamethasone generic mouth, and bleeding around the mouth sores. Your doctor may vibramycin online stores recommend medications to treat your headaches, such as Motrin (ibuprofen) purchase (ovral best price professional or Tylenol (acetaminophen). Your doctor will assess the severity of your.

As we were completing Blown to Bits, the big news on the copyright war front was the Jammie Thomas trial. (See “Sending a Message” in Chapter 6.) This was the first of the thousands of peer-to-peer lawsuits filed by the RIAA to go all the way to a jury trial. Thomas lost and lost big: The jury not only found the Minnesota woman guilty of sharing 24 songs using Kazaa, but they imposed a fine of $220,000: $9250 per song. This was a huge victory for the record companies, because the demonstrated reality of such high stakes for losing in court is a huge incentive for other targets of RIAA lawsuits to settle.

Now the verdict is being called into question. In May, trial court judge Michael Davis issued a ruling saying that he may have made a legal error in instructing the jury.

Here’s the issue: Thomas, and the other P2P lawsuit targets are accused of infringing copyright by illegally distributing music tracks. What they actually did (allegedly), was to place the music tracks on their computers in a way that made them available over the network. Does ‚Äúmaking available‚Äù count as ‚Äúdistribution‚Äù under the copyright law, or does ‚Äúdistribution‚Äù require the files actually be disseminated? This issue has come up before, and different courts have ruled differently on the issue. Judge Davis instructed the Thomas jury that ‚Äúmaking available‚Äù does in fact count as distribution. Now it appears that there is an appeals Court ruling in the 8^th Circuit going other way: ‚Äúdistribution‚Äù requires actual dissemination of material, not just ‚Äúmaking available‚Äù. Since Minnesota is in the 8^th Circuit, that should be a governing precedent in the Thomas case. Davis will hear arguments on the issue in hardings scheduled for July 1.

These gyrations underscore how uncomfortable the legal system becomes when old notions of copyright confront new digital realities and just how much the copyright balance has been toppled by the world of bits.

And things can get even murkier. As Villanova Law Professor Michael Carroll points out (http://carrollogos.blogspot.com/), the RIAA, in arguing for the ‚Äúmaking available‚Äù interpretation of distribution, may want to be careful of what it’s wishing for. US copyright law includes a provision called the first-sale doctrine, which says that once you’ve acquired a copy of something, it’s legal to redistribute it. That’s why used book stores are legal, for example. So if making music tracks available counts as distribution, it ought to be OK under the first-sale doctrine. In that case, the record companies would probably argue that placing music on a P2P network counts as contributory infringement, and the legal merry-go-round rides would continue.

This entry was posted on Sunday, June 22nd, 2008 at 1:18 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.