Blown To Bits

The Candidates on Net Neutrality

Monday, June 23rd, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Anyone buy cheap synthroid online with gallbladder cancer should speak with their healthcare team to buy generic buy online find out if surgery is appropriate for their situation. Gallbladder dexamethasone in malaysia cancer is rare and shares symptoms with other conditions, such viagra from india as cholecystitis, which is inflammation of the gallbladder. However, when get cheap cialis online effects this is not possible, treatment may become palliative to manage buy flagyl symptoms and improve the person's quality of life. However, there discount buy is little research to suggest that gene changes a person generic cialis cheap inherits from their parents are a cause of gallbladder cancer. cialis free sample A person should speak with a healthcare professional if they buy generic lasix would like to find out more or take part in clinical.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that “Sen. Obama is a supporter of legislation that would guarantee ‘network neutrality.'” Sen. McCain reportedly prefers a “market-based” approach, meaning that he opposes neutrality rules. We all love markets, but ask yourself how much a market there is in broadband services where you live. About half the country has zero or one choices, and virtually all the rest at most two, DSL and Cable. Hard for the free market to operate in a monopoly-duopoly world. In the absence of real broadband competition and consumer choice, the service providers have to be regulated to prevent them from using their carrier power to dictate content.

The story reports that Obama has reassembled some of the Clinton telecomm brain trust, including Reed Hundt, who had nice things to say about Blown to Bits. I suppose McCain just asked Cindy? (See the earlier post, McCain and Google.)

Comments are closed.