Blown To Bits

The Candidates on Net Neutrality

Monday, June 23rd, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Employers prednisolone online stores in these settings can maintain a TB prevention program and buy generic metronidazole gel support the timely identification of people who carry the TB buy cheap cipro bacteria. (The reason "-adbm" appears at the end of the buy erythromycin from india drug's name is to show that the drug is distinct flovent online from other biosimilar medications that may be created in the betnovate for order future.) Other side effects included neck pain, muscle stiffness, muscle clindamycin gel online stores weakness, pain, and redness or discoloration at injection sites. Strategies gentamicin eye drops to cope with a loved one with paranoid personality disorder find viagra online may include setting healthy boundaries, acknowledging their feelings, and practicing cheap asacol self-care. Following the publication of her book, Rebecca Skloot established cephalexin for order the Henrietta Lacks Foundation, with the purpose of "[h]elping individuals who.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that “Sen. Obama is a supporter of legislation that would guarantee ‘network neutrality.'” Sen. McCain reportedly prefers a “market-based” approach, meaning that he opposes neutrality rules. We all love markets, but ask yourself how much a market there is in broadband services where you live. About half the country has zero or one choices, and virtually all the rest at most two, DSL and Cable. Hard for the free market to operate in a monopoly-duopoly world. In the absence of real broadband competition and consumer choice, the service providers have to be regulated to prevent them from using their carrier power to dictate content.

The story reports that Obama has reassembled some of the Clinton telecomm brain trust, including Reed Hundt, who had nice things to say about Blown to Bits. I suppose McCain just asked Cindy? (See the earlier post, McCain and Google.)

Comments are closed.