Blown To Bits

The Candidates on Net Neutrality

Monday, June 23rd, 2008 by Harry Lewis
The buy cheapest cheap on line outcome of PTCL is generally poor except for anaplastic large cheap triamterene cell lymphoma and anaplastic lymphoma kinase. These cells help fight flovent sale infection by activating other cells, destroying germs, or slowing the buy for internet growth of dangerous invasive pathogens. Certain disease markers, including elevated cialis information levels of protein or lactate dehydrogenase in the cerebrospinal fluid, discount for no rx can affect a person's outlook after diagnosis. Doctors also use discount in bangkok the International Prognostic Index to estimate the prognosis, or outlook, allopurinol online sale for different types of NHL. There are also several newer discount mirapex treatments for NHL that researchers are currently testing in clinical buying cheap online trials, such as stem cell transplants. Some people with this buy cialis internet subtype experience abdominal pain and heartburn, or people may experience no.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that “Sen. Obama is a supporter of legislation that would guarantee ‘network neutrality.'” Sen. McCain reportedly prefers a “market-based” approach, meaning that he opposes neutrality rules. We all love markets, but ask yourself how much a market there is in broadband services where you live. About half the country has zero or one choices, and virtually all the rest at most two, DSL and Cable. Hard for the free market to operate in a monopoly-duopoly world. In the absence of real broadband competition and consumer choice, the service providers have to be regulated to prevent them from using their carrier power to dictate content.

The story reports that Obama has reassembled some of the Clinton telecomm brain trust, including Reed Hundt, who had nice things to say about Blown to Bits. I suppose McCain just asked Cindy? (See the earlier post, McCain and Google.)

Comments are closed.