Blown To Bits

The Candidates on Net Neutrality

Monday, June 23rd, 2008 by Harry Lewis
If methotrexate for order people with pancreatic cancer have difficulty maintaining or gaining weight, glyburide overnight shipping they may benefit from a high calorie diet that is find cheap on internet dense in nutrients and protein to sustain energy levels and order nexium increase their weight. Some of these dietary changes may worsen cialis overnight shipping pancreatic cancer symptoms and even affect treatment efficacy. A registered discount tetracycline dietitian can create a personalized diet plan based on an price of in individual's tolerance levels for various foods. Some of the most cheapest azor common methods of gaining weight may conflict with foods and robaxin for sale beverages that could cause digestive discomfort in people with pancreatic flagyl buy online cancer. The authors state that anyone who is experiencing weight xalatan for sale loss or symptoms of malnutrition should speak with a healthcare cheap flovent professional such as a registered dietitian. The colloquial term meat sweats.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that “Sen. Obama is a supporter of legislation that would guarantee ‘network neutrality.'” Sen. McCain reportedly prefers a “market-based” approach, meaning that he opposes neutrality rules. We all love markets, but ask yourself how much a market there is in broadband services where you live. About half the country has zero or one choices, and virtually all the rest at most two, DSL and Cable. Hard for the free market to operate in a monopoly-duopoly world. In the absence of real broadband competition and consumer choice, the service providers have to be regulated to prevent them from using their carrier power to dictate content.

The story reports that Obama has reassembled some of the Clinton telecomm brain trust, including Reed Hundt, who had nice things to say about Blown to Bits. I suppose McCain just asked Cindy? (See the earlier post, McCain and Google.)

Comments are closed.