Blown To Bits

The Candidates on Net Neutrality

Monday, June 23rd, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Therefore, order nasonex if a person in the hospital is prescribed Xarelto, Medicare order celexa Part A covers the cost while they are in the buy generic robaxin hospital. In addition, some pharmacies may provide coupons towards the store get generic without clomid prescription cost of the drug, which may be used with their order internet Medicare coverage. A person can contract tetanus when Clostridium tetani order generic augmentin bacteria in the dirt, dust, or soil enter the body generic methotrexate prescription professional through cuts, grazes, or puncture wounds. Part D out-of-pocket expensesA order no rx cialis person's out-of-pocket costs will include their Medicare Part D premium, free azor online order deductible, coinsurance, and copayment. Hard wax is more difficult for buy cheap remeron the tiny hairs to move out of the ear, which buy compazine online can lead to a blockage, or an impaction, in the ear.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that “Sen. Obama is a supporter of legislation that would guarantee ‘network neutrality.'” Sen. McCain reportedly prefers a “market-based” approach, meaning that he opposes neutrality rules. We all love markets, but ask yourself how much a market there is in broadband services where you live. About half the country has zero or one choices, and virtually all the rest at most two, DSL and Cable. Hard for the free market to operate in a monopoly-duopoly world. In the absence of real broadband competition and consumer choice, the service providers have to be regulated to prevent them from using their carrier power to dictate content.

The story reports that Obama has reassembled some of the Clinton telecomm brain trust, including Reed Hundt, who had nice things to say about Blown to Bits. I suppose McCain just asked Cindy? (See the earlier post, McCain and Google.)

Comments are closed.