Blown To Bits

The Candidates on Net Neutrality

Monday, June 23rd, 2008 by Harry Lewis
If buying bentyl cost a person decides to treat constipation with dietary changes, it cafergot without prescription may take a few weeks for symptoms to ease. It order cialis online is best for a person to let their doctor know diclofenac about any symptoms they are experiencing and discuss the effects bentyl constipation has on their daily life. However, other researchers have cheap generic accutane found health benefits and high satisfaction rates, with few adverse griseofulvin for order effects, in people following the carnivore diet. These medications either cheap buy tablets draw water to the bowel or stimulate the muscles to augmentin cheap help a person go to the toilet. If a person purchase gentamicin eye drops online experiences constipation, it is very unlikely to lead to complications or.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that “Sen. Obama is a supporter of legislation that would guarantee ‘network neutrality.'” Sen. McCain reportedly prefers a “market-based” approach, meaning that he opposes neutrality rules. We all love markets, but ask yourself how much a market there is in broadband services where you live. About half the country has zero or one choices, and virtually all the rest at most two, DSL and Cable. Hard for the free market to operate in a monopoly-duopoly world. In the absence of real broadband competition and consumer choice, the service providers have to be regulated to prevent them from using their carrier power to dictate content.

The story reports that Obama has reassembled some of the Clinton telecomm brain trust, including Reed Hundt, who had nice things to say about Blown to Bits. I suppose McCain just asked Cindy? (See the earlier post, McCain and Google.)

Comments are closed.