Blown To Bits

The Candidates on Net Neutrality

Monday, June 23rd, 2008 by Harry Lewis
However, buy cialis low cost pharmacy if you experience severe, bothersome, or persistent symptoms of orthostatic cialis cheap price hypotension, talk with your doctor. A person with jaw bone buy generic synthroid best price cancer develops a malignant tumor on their mandible, lower jaw information no serevent prescription buy cheap bone, or maxilla, which is the hard palate or upper viagra tablets jaw bone. There are currently no recommendations from CBD experts sale discount clindamycin or healthcare professionals about what CBD dosage to use for buy cialis internet COPD. To improve their sleep, people with psoriasis can try purchase generic acomplia side effects and alcohol limiting alcohol and caffeine, going to bed and getting up buy nexium at the same time every day, and sleeping in a buy cheap levitra online dark, cool, and quiet room. These can serve as a lasix without prescription bridge to support a person with ALF or ACLF until a.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that “Sen. Obama is a supporter of legislation that would guarantee ‘network neutrality.'” Sen. McCain reportedly prefers a “market-based” approach, meaning that he opposes neutrality rules. We all love markets, but ask yourself how much a market there is in broadband services where you live. About half the country has zero or one choices, and virtually all the rest at most two, DSL and Cable. Hard for the free market to operate in a monopoly-duopoly world. In the absence of real broadband competition and consumer choice, the service providers have to be regulated to prevent them from using their carrier power to dictate content.

The story reports that Obama has reassembled some of the Clinton telecomm brain trust, including Reed Hundt, who had nice things to say about Blown to Bits. I suppose McCain just asked Cindy? (See the earlier post, McCain and Google.)

Comments are closed.