These buy toradol us medications slow the heart rate, which can keep a person levitra for sale from having an atrial tachycardia episode. Doctors can also direct canadian flovent people to support networks that may be able to help buy quinine low price both financially and emotionally. There are currently no recommended screening generic erythromycin practices for checking thyroid function during the postpartum period in cheap cialis on internet people with no symptoms of a thyroid disorder. People can online pharmacy viagra find out more about applying for financial assistance for PrEP low cost celexa from the San Francisco Aids Foundation or via the Please cheap cialis overnight delivery PrEP Me website. It is important to ask a person buy free cialis prescription what their pronouns are and to share one's own pronouns buy allopurinol lowest price to foster an inclusive environment. The authors conclude that the lasix in bangkok vaccine is safe and that people with arthritis generally tolerate buy generic retin-a it well. This makes it less hard and compacted, which is.

The worlds of copyright and privacy collided on Tuesday to cause a massive, privacy-shattering digital explosion. A judge ordered Google, which owns YouTube, to turn over to Viacom all its records of who has watched what videos. What clip, under what name, and from what IP address. Viacom is suing Google for accommodating its copyrighted materials on YouTube, and the judge dismissed privacy arguments Google tried to mount as “speculative.” The story is here and the judge’s order is here. (Thanks to Wired’s blog for these.)

Readers of Blown to Bits will recall how easily “anonymized” search records were de-identified, so there is serious reason to doubt that the fact that YouTube users are free to choose non-identifying login names will really protect their privacy.

The logs themselves comprise twelve TERABYTEs of data. There are lots of things that can be done with that data and there are lots of ways it can go astray ….

The judge denied various other requests of the plaintiffs, including a request for the source code of the Google search engine itself, supposedly so the plaintiff could check if Google was doing something special to make infringing material more attractive.

But the judge did require Google to turn over every video it has ever taken down for any reason, so Viacom can sort through them and draw their own conclusions about why. So if you ever put up a video while you were drunk and then changed your mind in the cold light of day, it’s part of the evidence in this court case now.

So much for the illusion that watching YouTube is like watching TV. But I’m sure there’s no reason to be worried about all those activity logs. Surely everyone will understand that you were just horsing around when you were watching that stuff ‚Ķ or maybe you were conducting research, yes, that’s what you were doing ‚Ķ.

This entry was posted on Thursday, July 3rd, 2008 at 1:35 pm and is filed under Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.