No mirapex no rx routine screening tests are available for pancreatic cancer because experts amikacin without prescription do not believe that screening reduces deaths. If a doctor order discount cephalexin side effects effects suspects pancreatic cancer, they may order a type of CT online medicine scan called a CT pancreas protocol scan. The doctor sends low cost online the biopsy sample to a laboratory, where a pathologist views buy no rx viagra it under a microscope. To determine survival rates, researchers utilize advair without prescription a range of factors, including the cancer's stage, the individual's cheap cheap on internet age, overall health, the treatment plan, and how the cancer buy zyprexa responds to treatment. Researchers are also constantly working on treatments buy serevent without prescription that are improving the outlook of pancreatic cancer. The most norvasc online stores common surgery for pancreatic cancer is called a pancreaticoduodenectomy, also buy artane without prescription known as the Whipple procedure. Doctors may use ablation as a.

Here’s¬†a good AP column about the way the major players limit what can be said in order to satisfy what they consider appropriate standards of taste. There is a wonderful example of a Dutch photographer whose documentary photo of a street scene in Romania was taken down from Flickr — twice. The problem? It showed a young adolescent boy smoking, as happens a lot on the streets of Romania. Flickr didn’t want to encourage youth smoking, or perhaps didn’t want to be accused of encouraging youth smoking, or perhaps received actual complaints about the photo and found it easier to censor than to argue.

This is a tough problem, as private enterprises should generally be left to do whatever they feel is best for business, and it’s hard to see this kind of censorship as harmful. But as sites like Flickr become the technological equivalent of the public square, attracting huge numbers of participants because a huge number of participants are already there, it’s equally hard not to think that the personal judgments of random employees should not be decisive in what can be shown and what can’t be. And government regulations immediately raise the problem that web sites are multinational and governments aren’t.¬†

This entry was posted on Friday, July 11th, 2008 at 9:09 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.