Gelastic
t-ject 60 without prescription seizures may be challenging for healthcare professionals to diagnose definitively,
canada cialis even if they think someone is experiencing this type of
order augmentin no prescription required seizure based on their symptoms. Recently, researchers have also identified
azor online new ALS treatments and made advancements in existing treatments that
toradol for order may slow disease progression. Some care facilities also offer their
compazine online own payment plans that can help lower upfront costs by
diovan online cheap spreading them over a longer period of time. Most brachial
spiriva pill plexus injuries are stretch injuries and improve without treatment or
get cheap dexamethasone online effects with physical therapy. Quick screening methods, such as pacifier thermometers
order augmentin and fever strips, are less accurate than digital thermometers. To
buy cialis once daily keep HIV levels undetectable, it is crucial to take medications
azor for order consistently as prescribed and attend regular checkups. During hemochromatosis diagnosis,
colchicine approved healthcare professionals may also identify complications of the condition, such as.
Here’s¬†a good AP column about the way the major players limit what can be said in order to satisfy what they consider appropriate standards of taste. There is a wonderful example of a Dutch photographer whose documentary photo of a street scene in Romania was taken down from Flickr — twice. The problem? It showed a young adolescent boy smoking, as happens a lot on the streets of Romania. Flickr didn’t want to encourage youth smoking, or perhaps didn’t want to be accused of encouraging youth smoking, or perhaps received actual complaints about the photo and found it easier to censor than to argue.
This is a tough problem, as private enterprises should generally be left to do whatever they feel is best for business, and it’s hard to see this kind of censorship as harmful. But as sites like Flickr become the technological equivalent of the public square, attracting huge numbers of participants because a huge number of participants are already there, it’s equally hard not to think that the personal judgments of random employees should not be decisive in what can be shown and what can’t be. And government regulations immediately raise the problem that web sites are multinational and governments aren’t.¬†
This entry was posted
on Friday, July 11th, 2008 at 9:09 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.