For purchase vibramycin online this reason, people should always seek the advice of a discount celexa healthcare professional before starting to take a supplement. Medicare pays zoloft sale for this benefit to provide as much comfort and peace order cialis online as possible to people with terminal health conditions as they buy cheap ventolin online near the end of their life. Psychological treatments aim to buy viagra in us reduce the negative impact that chronic pain can have on order quinine a person's mental health. Untreated endometriosis can cause worsening symptoms, buy azor online and it can also lead to serious complications. Many methods information no viagra prescription buy cheap treat right-sided heart failure depending on the cause and an discount spiriva individual's circumstances. When a person drinks alcohol, the liver prioritizes cheapest generic robaxin processing that alcohol and may temporarily pause other liver functions, cheapest gentamicin eye drops such as gluconeogenesis, the production of glucose for transport into buy flovent online the bloodstream. This has been shown in prior studies but buy gentamicin eye drops the current study is one of the very largest," Dr. arcoxia sale Fredericks said. They do this by taking the cells from the.

Chapter 8 of Blown to Bits tells the tale of how the federal government got into the business of determining which parts of the female anatomy may be shown on broadcast television and for how long, and whether the occasional s-word or f-word may be spoken. It’s an important story, because it’s one of the few clear-cut instances of a sweeping override of the First Amendment by a government body. And that body, the Federal Communications Commission, keeps reaching farther. For example, it has proposed to grease the rails for companies willing to provide a free-to-the-public, fully censored parallel Internet universe over the airwaves, an Internet with a mechanism

That filters or blocks images and text that constitute obscenity or pornography and, in context, as measured by contemporary community standards and existing law,  any images or text that otherwise would be harmful to teens and adolescents.  For purposes of this rule, teens and adolescents are children 5 through 17 years of age.

You read that right: nothing unsuitable for a 5-year old could be said or shown over this network.

While I have no interest in the famous Janet Jackson halftime stunt (I love the Superbowl, but never watch the halftime shows), I am delighted that the FCC fine was thrown out by a federal court as being capricious and arbitrary. The court essentially ruled that the FCC had improperly raised its standards. The Technology Liberation Front has a good explanation of the decision and a link to the decision itself.

An even more important judicial deliberation will be happening in the coming Supreme Court term, when the entire issue of the FCC’s indecency standards will be under review.

In the meantime, isn’t it odd that the FCC is working so hard to make broadcast TV safer for children than it has ever been, just at the moment when from what I can tell, the advertisers think the only people watching network TV are those who need AARP, Viagra, and motorized wheelchairs?

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008 at 1:09 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech, The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.