Blown To Bits

The FCC’s indecency standards

Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Health diflucan for order professionals must diagnose based on the individual's experience and observations cialis uk of symptoms. That said, scientists have yet to discover the cheapest generic cialis exact reason to explain why the incidence rate differs among cheapest viagra males and females. This may involve saying no to social atenolol no prescription situations or isolating themselves from friends and family to prevent find no rx flagyl opportunities for physical contact. Fluorescein is one of the most buy generic retin-a common dyes for ocular surface staining because it has many buy generic retin-a cost professional applications. This can depend on the symptoms a person experiences, glucophage no prescription how they view their condition, and whether they meet any cafergot pill legal criteria for disability. The job of the sigmoid colon gel drug is to solidify stool before it enters the rectum and anal.

Chapter 8 of Blown to Bits tells the tale of how the federal government got into the business of determining which parts of the female anatomy may be shown on broadcast television and for how long, and whether the occasional s-word or f-word may be spoken. It’s an important story, because it’s one of the few clear-cut instances of a sweeping override of the First Amendment by a government body. And that body, the Federal Communications Commission, keeps reaching farther. For example, it has proposed to grease the rails for companies willing to provide a free-to-the-public, fully censored parallel Internet universe over the airwaves, an Internet with a mechanism

That filters or blocks images and text that constitute obscenity or pornography and, in context, as measured by contemporary community standards and existing law,  any images or text that otherwise would be harmful to teens and adolescents.  For purposes of this rule, teens and adolescents are children 5 through 17 years of age.

You read that right: nothing unsuitable for a 5-year old could be said or shown over this network.

While I have no interest in the famous Janet Jackson halftime stunt (I love the Superbowl, but never watch the halftime shows), I am delighted that the FCC fine was thrown out by a federal court as being capricious and arbitrary. The court essentially ruled that the FCC had improperly raised its standards. The Technology Liberation Front has a good explanation of the decision and a link to the decision itself.

An even more important judicial deliberation will be happening in the coming Supreme Court term, when the entire issue of the FCC’s indecency standards will be under review.

In the meantime, isn’t it odd that the FCC is working so hard to make broadcast TV safer for children than it has ever been, just at the moment when from what I can tell, the advertisers think the only people watching network TV are those who need AARP, Viagra, and motorized wheelchairs?

Comments are closed.