Typically, order cialis online the higher the dosage of anticholinergic medications, the more side certified gel effects a person is likely to experience. Gestational diabetes may clomid online also affect the health of the fetus, as they may buy retin-a without prescription have a large birth weight or have low blood sugar discount celebrex levels when they are born. The participants who used the order cheap estradiol work hydrocolloid dressings showed a statistically significant larger reduction in inflammation purchase cheap bentyl sale overdose and acne severity. People will need to seek immediate medical buy accutane online attention if they experience a sudden, severe headache, vomiting, or real viagra without prescription loss of consciousness. There is no cure for the common cephalexin online stores cold, but over-the-counter cold products may provide temporary relief of glucophage sales symptoms. They may also use these methods to monitor the buy cheap arcoxia side effects liquid progression of someone's testicular cancer or check for any spread. buy prozac They can take a small sip of the diluted mixture, gel in us tilt the head back, and gargle for several seconds before spitting.

The New York Times had several good bits stories over the weekend. The Education Week article about de-tagging Facebook photos, for example. Cheap, ubiquitous sensors–digital cameras in the hands of teenagers and college students–combined with the vast Facebook social network have resulted in lots of embarrassing party photos appearing online every Sunday morning. When their peers tag the photos with the names of the people appearing in them, the photos turn up in searches for the names of the revelers. So every Sunday afternoon the hung-over youth “de-tag” the photos, which remain visible but unsearchable. (And if you’re the only one not tagged in the photo, well, that creates an interesting social tension–you’re saying you’re the only one who believes that your reputation is going to be damaged by being seen with the others at that party!)

But my favorite is the story about the perhaps under-age Chinese gymnasts. They have passports showing their age as 16, the minimum allowed in Olympic competition. But the enterprising reporters think some may be as early as 14. Why?

The Times found two online records of official registration lists of Chinese gymnasts that list He’s birthday as Jan. 1, 1994, which would make her 14. A 2007 national registry of Chinese gymnasts — now blocked in China but viewable through Google cache — shows He’s age as “1994.1.1.”

Another registration list that is unblocked, dated Jan. 27, 2006, and regarding an “intercity” competition in Chengdu, China, also lists He’s birthday as Jan. 1, 1994. That date differs by two years from the birth date of Jan. 1, 1992, listed on He’s passport, which was issued Feb. 14, 2008.

Nice detective work. Some earlier public list of athletes had the correct date, goes the theory; Google indexed it and kept a copy, as Google generally does; the Chinese later decided to make the athlete a couple of years older, and took the web page down; but Google’s cached copy is still visible from the U.S. site where it is stored. Just like the example on page 125 of Blown to Bits. Except in this case, the cached copy itself is blocked inside China, even though it’s a copy of a Chinese web page. Bits are awfully hard to eradicate–it will be interesting to see if this incident becomes a problem for the Chinese team.

This entry was posted on Monday, July 28th, 2008 at 10:07 am and is filed under Search. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.