How diflucan online stores we vet brands and productsMedical News Today only shows you where to order clomid brands and products that we stand behind. As a result, approved atenolol pharmacy doctors may diagnose the cancer at a more advanced stage atenolol in uk when it is more challenging to treat. You should always buy cheap azor online consult your doctor or another healthcare professional before taking any purchase cheap cipro online canada medication. The incident with the vase left a visible scar cheap price lasix on my arm, a permanent reminder of the violence I buy diclofenac without prescription had endured. This is a common treatment for a number buy diflucan online of medical conditions, including a number of cancers as well viagra cheap as immune system disorders, blood disorders, and metabolic disorders. The compazine online stores most suitable treatment options for a child will depend on buy estrace vaginal cream the type and severity of their symptoms. There are multiple best price for viagra clotting factors and different types of hemophilia, which correspond to order bentyl deficiencies of different clotting factors. In gaming addicts, there are functional.

The New York Times had several good bits stories over the weekend. The Education Week article about de-tagging Facebook photos, for example. Cheap, ubiquitous sensors–digital cameras in the hands of teenagers and college students–combined with the vast Facebook social network have resulted in lots of embarrassing party photos appearing online every Sunday morning. When their peers tag the photos with the names of the people appearing in them, the photos turn up in searches for the names of the revelers. So every Sunday afternoon the hung-over youth “de-tag” the photos, which remain visible but unsearchable. (And if you’re the only one not tagged in the photo, well, that creates an interesting social tension–you’re saying you’re the only one who believes that your reputation is going to be damaged by being seen with the others at that party!)

But my favorite is the story about the perhaps under-age Chinese gymnasts. They have passports showing their age as 16, the minimum allowed in Olympic competition. But the enterprising reporters think some may be as early as 14. Why?

The Times found two online records of official registration lists of Chinese gymnasts that list He’s birthday as Jan. 1, 1994, which would make her 14. A 2007 national registry of Chinese gymnasts — now blocked in China but viewable through Google cache — shows He’s age as “1994.1.1.”

Another registration list that is unblocked, dated Jan. 27, 2006, and regarding an “intercity” competition in Chengdu, China, also lists He’s birthday as Jan. 1, 1994. That date differs by two years from the birth date of Jan. 1, 1992, listed on He’s passport, which was issued Feb. 14, 2008.

Nice detective work. Some earlier public list of athletes had the correct date, goes the theory; Google indexed it and kept a copy, as Google generally does; the Chinese later decided to make the athlete a couple of years older, and took the web page down; but Google’s cached copy is still visible from the U.S. site where it is stored. Just like the example on page 125 of Blown to Bits. Except in this case, the cached copy itself is blocked inside China, even though it’s a copy of a Chinese web page. Bits are awfully hard to eradicate–it will be interesting to see if this incident becomes a problem for the Chinese team.

This entry was posted on Monday, July 28th, 2008 at 10:07 am and is filed under Search. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.