Most discount glucophage people can treat constipation with home remedies and lifestyle changes, purchase methotrexate online but if a person is frequently experiencing poop getting stuck buy clomid canada halfway out, they may need medical advice. To take a cialis for order blood sample, a healthcare professional prepares a needle and syringe, buy cheap artane online then finds an accessible vein, often in the forearm. Bladder get cheap amoxicillin online effects training goes by several other names, including "bladder retraining," "bladder estrace online stores re-education," and "bladder drill." People may be able to stop glucophage prescription hair from becoming greasy as quickly by using a gentle buy free cephalexin clarifying shampoo and lightweight, non-greasy hair products. Most conditions that augmentin without prescription cause inflammation in the chest area can cause enlargement of generic (ovral cheap the chest lymph nodes. Botox and certain antibioticsCertain antibiotics can cialis order increase the risk of side effects such as unwanted muscle diflucan us weakness from Botox. According to the company's website, many of find ventolin no prescription required the ingredients come from farms in the Finger Lakes agricultural viagra free sample region of upstate New York. This drug may not be the.

Last April (see MSN Music RIP) I blogged about Microsoft’s decision to shut down the license servers for MSN Music at the end of August, thereby stranding customers who had purchased music tracks governed by MSN Music’s Digital Rights Management. As it turned out, Microsoft reconsidered, and now says that the license servers will operate until at least 2011.

Now Yahoo has joined the DRM customer stranding game with its July 23rd announcement that it will shut down the Yahoo Music Store servers at the end of September. The result will be that anyone who purchased Music Store tracks will be unable to move them to new machines after the deadline. As with Microsoft’s (since retracted) announcement, this is another demonstration that customers don’t really own the music they “purchase” under DRM systems. Instead, they remain dependent on the distributor’s willingness to keep the DRM license servers running: something for which the distributor has given no long-term guarantee.

As Blown to Bits argues, DRM is a bad deal for customers and a bad deal for innovation. It’s also a bad deal for the music distributors themselves, since it obligates them to maintain an ongoing technical infrastructure of license servers. It’s encouraging to see the continuted growth of non-DRM alternatives for music distribution. Now if only Congress would figure out what a bill of goods they’ve been sold by DRM pushers.

This entry was posted on Saturday, July 26th, 2008 at 11:53 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.