To find 60 on internet help treat hepatitis A symptoms, people can try to get discount cialis no rx enough rest, eat a nutritious diet, and drink plenty of generic prescription fluids to stay well-hydrated. This is because the body produces get cheapest buy low price canada antibodies when a person has the virus, resulting in lifelong generic in protection against getting the infection again. Another key difference between dexamethasone no prescription latent TB infection and active TB disease is that TB cialis in bangkok disease can spread to other people. A TB skin test order buy lowest dosage cheapest price involves injecting a tuberculin purified protein derivative antigen into the purchase generic buy alternatives problems surface of the skin of the forearm. TB latency, or buy sale free pharmacy latent TB infection, occurs when M. tuberculosis bacteria enter the cheapest amoxicillin online body and remain inactive. Review authors link low microbial variety buy xalatan online with intestinal inflammation and disrupted intestinal barrier functioning. Researchers define advair low price antibiotic resistance as a bacterium's ability to elude the effects buy estradiol cheap of certain antibiotics that usually inhibit or eradicate other bacteria serevent online stores from the same species. Other conditions that can ultimately require antibiotics.

Last April (see MSN Music RIP) I blogged about Microsoft’s decision to shut down the license servers for MSN Music at the end of August, thereby stranding customers who had purchased music tracks governed by MSN Music’s Digital Rights Management. As it turned out, Microsoft reconsidered, and now says that the license servers will operate until at least 2011.

Now Yahoo has joined the DRM customer stranding game with its July 23rd announcement that it will shut down the Yahoo Music Store servers at the end of September. The result will be that anyone who purchased Music Store tracks will be unable to move them to new machines after the deadline. As with Microsoft’s (since retracted) announcement, this is another demonstration that customers don’t really own the music they “purchase” under DRM systems. Instead, they remain dependent on the distributor’s willingness to keep the DRM license servers running: something for which the distributor has given no long-term guarantee.

As Blown to Bits argues, DRM is a bad deal for customers and a bad deal for innovation. It’s also a bad deal for the music distributors themselves, since it obligates them to maintain an ongoing technical infrastructure of license servers. It’s encouraging to see the continuted growth of non-DRM alternatives for music distribution. Now if only Congress would figure out what a bill of goods they’ve been sold by DRM pushers.

This entry was posted on Saturday, July 26th, 2008 at 11:53 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.