Unwanted order cheap viagra online pregnancies can result in emotional and psychological challenges, financial burdens, canadian atenolol and potential health-related challenges for all partners involved. Researchers have viagra pills not quite been able to "connect the dots" between smoking, cheap toradol cancer, and aging, Dr. Dale said, but the new research buy cialis low price suggests telomere damage "might be one piece of that." Meals estrace without prescription from RealEats are generally nutritious, as they include fresh vegetables order tizanidine and healthy sources of protein. A surgeon numbs the eye cheap robaxin no rx area with an injection or numbing eye drops.Using a microscope, colchicine sale a surgeon guides the laser to create small incisions into lipitor prescription the eye through the cornea, the eye's outer layer.The laser buy cheap cafergot online cuts a circle in the lens and breaks up the cataract.

Last April (see MSN Music RIP) I blogged about Microsoft’s decision to shut down the license servers for MSN Music at the end of August, thereby stranding customers who had purchased music tracks governed by MSN Music’s Digital Rights Management. As it turned out, Microsoft reconsidered, and now says that the license servers will operate until at least 2011.

Now Yahoo has joined the DRM customer stranding game with its July 23rd announcement that it will shut down the Yahoo Music Store servers at the end of September. The result will be that anyone who purchased Music Store tracks will be unable to move them to new machines after the deadline. As with Microsoft’s (since retracted) announcement, this is another demonstration that customers don’t really own the music they “purchase” under DRM systems. Instead, they remain dependent on the distributor’s willingness to keep the DRM license servers running: something for which the distributor has given no long-term guarantee.

As Blown to Bits argues, DRM is a bad deal for customers and a bad deal for innovation. It’s also a bad deal for the music distributors themselves, since it obligates them to maintain an ongoing technical infrastructure of license servers. It’s encouraging to see the continuted growth of non-DRM alternatives for music distribution. Now if only Congress would figure out what a bill of goods they’ve been sold by DRM pushers.

This entry was posted on Saturday, July 26th, 2008 at 11:53 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.