Automation Risks
Wednesday, August 13th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Doctors atrovent cheap price have noted an increased prevalence among females with PCOS whose buy generic aldactone no prescription usa sisters and mothers also have the condition. A recent review purchase estrace vaginal cream online of research on both conditions suggests that endometriosis occurs in lowest price best 7–8% of females with PCOS and is usually mild. According real online without prescription to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, lifestyle changes cheap no rx required such as losing weight can trigger more regular periods in sale discount in people with PCOS. The sooner a person receives a diagnosis, buy pharmacy the sooner they can begin treatment and improve their symptoms. estrace no prescription The minipill works in a similar way, but only contains buy generic online no prescription usa progestin and may not reliably suppress ovulation. The length of cheapest buy online time an individual should take BCPs before starting IVF can cheap buy pill vary, as there is no set period. There are many australia prices different BCP options, so finding a suitable option may require buy cheap (ovral alternative some trial and error. However, an individual's ability to conceive cheap betnovate tablet will return to expected levels when they stop taking their medication..
We talk a lot about how digital technologies are improving, and in particular making it possible to do automated language-processing tasks that used to require human intervention. A couple of nice examples that the technologies are not perfect yet. First, a reminder that automated language translation still requires human checking, especially if the output is going to be publicly deployed:
Or this attempt at automated cake decoration, which triggered an error message in the decorating software:
Thanks to Adweek for the restaurant sign and to Livejournal for the cake.