IBS discount atrovent may worsen symptoms of eating disorders by making a person clonidine online stores anxious about eating if it makes them feel unwell. If viagra purchase you have insurance, your insurance company may require prior authorization buy amikacin without prescription before it covers Nucala. Tea leaves can therefore mimic the 60 without rx consistency and appearance of tobacco, and a person can smoke buy cheapest viagra online them. A doctor combines findings from a person's medical history, generic clozapine specialized tests, and imaging to identify a blood clot in order natural cialis no prescription the femoral vein. Treatment may include antihistamines for mild allergies purchase metronidazole gel online and emergency medications, such as EpiPen adrenaline injectors for severe buy cheap glyburide online reactions. In particular, anything that can affect or reduce blood discount cialis no rx flow in this area can increase the risk of a blood.

A story by Emily Steel in today’s Wall Street Journal, “The Ad Changes with the Shopper in Front of It,” reports that retail stores are increasingly moving to in-store advertising. The declining prices of flatscreen displays explains part of the surge. But of course with a digital advertising screen, the ads can change depending on local conditions. Proctor and Gamble is playing with some interesting ideas (my paraphrases):

• * Put RFID tags on shampoo bottles. Then when a customer picks up a bottle from the shelf, flash at her some suggestions about matching conditioners.

That one is pretty weak, actually. But the next one is not.

• * Put a camera at the screen to watch who is standing in front of it. Suggest different hair care products depending on the customer’s appearance. Can’t you just see it? “Hah! She’s graying. Let’s make sure she knows that even a computer notices, and pitch some hair coloring.”

It’s inevitable that these things will be tried. Will they work? Probably, creepy as they seem at first.

And of course a camera at the check-out could match faces and track what people actually buy, as correlated with what they looked at and what advertising they saw …

This entry was posted on Thursday, August 21st, 2008 at 9:40 pm and is filed under Surveillance. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.