Blown To Bits

A Positive Development on Surveillance of Consumers

Friday, September 26th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
The discount viagra without prescription Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not directly approved HRT purchase triamterene online to treat OAB, and there are certain risks associated with remeron without prescription HRT. WNV enters the bloodstream and reproduces, and sometimes it cheap generic cialis can cross the blood-brain barrier to cause inflammation in the buy cheap clindamycin gel online brain. People can use this online tool provided by Planned real cialis without prescription Parenthood to check what the abortion laws are in each buy cheapest (metacam) state. Uric acid is the byproduct of purines, organic compounds buy cheapest viagra found in cells that naturally break down through biological processes norvasc online and due to the digestion of certain proteins. More scientific clomid overnight delivery research is necessary to understand the effects of cannabis, CBD, prozac for order and THC.Learn the difference between CBD and THC here. This viagra buy type of sunscreen is suitable for sensitive skin and does best price for prozac not have the same damaging effect on marine life. Following buy generic lasix a diagnosis of Alzheimer's, doctors will work with the patient and.

Verizon and AT&T have announced that they will not track their customers’ Internet wanderings without their explicit request. The key is that the default is no tracking; only if the customer affirmatively “opts in” to tracking will it occur.

ISPs were getting some heat from Congress because of privacy concerns, so the move by these ISPs surely is enlightenment prompted by anticipation of a mandate. Nonetheless, it’s not a small matter. The data on what we do on the Internet is an extremely valuable commodity, and these companies might have put up a stronger fight for their right to collect it. Comcast, will you please adopt the same posture?

The Washington Post story on this makes several important points. The opt-in provision is likely to result in a very low level of participation in tracking, unless customers who are being tracked have a perceptibly better experience than those who do not. Still, with millions of users, a lot of data can be collected even if participation is low in percentage terms.

Nothing in the announcement by these service providers limits what individual web services can do to collect data about you by storing cookies on your computer. That mechanism aids the targeting of advertising toward your particular interests. And while informed consent and education about privacy should be major goals for the industry, it is worth remembering that the explosion of the Internet as a service to noncommercial users is largely funded by advertising revenue. Though one should always be skeptical about sky-is-falling statements by trade group representatives, there is some truth to this claim:

“If Congress required ‘opt in’ today, Congress would be back in tomorrow writing an Internet bailout bill,” said Mike Zaneis, vice president of public policy for the¬†Interactive Advertising Bureau, a trade group. “Every advertising platform and business model would be put at risk.”

One Response to “A Positive Development on Surveillance of Consumers”

  1. Opt in/Opt out? Consumers Benefit from Surveillance Backlash « THE IDEAS LAB Says:

    […] some say it has the potential to radically affect industry-wide online advertising practices. Experts suggest that forcing users to “opt in” could undermine the Internet economy because […]