Blown To Bits

A Strange Loop at Wikipedia

Monday, September 22nd, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Depending cheapest zoloft on the reason for needing them, a doctor will select clozapine online stores the most appropriate blood thinner after a thorough evaluation of aldactone rx an individual. Additionally, it is vital to regularly attend follow-up order natural atrovent no prescription appointments with a healthcare professional to monitor the effectiveness of synthroid without prescription treatment and discuss any concerns or side effects. If an order generic buy prescription and alcohol individual experiences severe symptoms or side effects, they should consult buy cheap from india a doctor or seek emergency help. However, pericardial effusion can methotrexate online without prescription develop without inflammation, such as if a person has cancerous buy generic bentyl cost oral tumors. The pericardial rub refers to the sound of the get cheap no online effects increased levels of fluid causing the pericardium to rub against cheap zyprexa the heart's outer layer. People experiencing pericardial effusions that have compare cheap prices online developed into cardiac tamponade may require emergency surgery and a zofran for order hospital stay. The conditions cause similar symptoms, including chest pain that.

Wikipedia is a marvel. In spite of the fact that anyone can edit it and all editing is pseudonymous, it works. For a lot of math theorems, for example, the resource is fantastic for quick lookup. If you’ve never used it, try it for whatever interests you and judge for yourself. If the entry is imperfect, just fix it. You can see the result instantly.

Wikipedia is very inclusive since anyone can start an entry. But there are standards for inclusion; if you try to make an entry for your dog, it will get deleted, unless your dog is famous for some reason.

So, storage being cheap, someone started Deletionpedia, an inventory of all the entries that have been deleted from Wikipedia. It’s kind of interesting, I guess.

And then someone created a Wikipedia page about it.

Which was deleted. Go figure. It was restored, and a debate is raging among Wikipedians about the right and justice of all this. The page is still up for now, but that link may die at any moment.

2 Responses to “A Strange Loop at Wikipedia”

  1. Hilary Says:

    This seems like a more comprehensive version of Wikidumper (http://wikidumper.blogspot.com/), “The Official Appreciation Page for the Best of the Wikipedia Rejects”.

  2. pandora Says:

    Thank you very much for this info. Looking forward to next one.