Different order generic quinine treatment options are available for advanced dementia, including medication and cheap robaxin ongoing care support. It is vital to keep the tattooed cheapest generic glucophage online area scrupulously clean and follow the tattooist's aftercare instructions. If viagra generic a person loses a sex toy inside their anus, they cephalexin free delivery may have to have a medical professional remove it in viagra sale a hospital. Disseminated shingles is rare and most often affects buy cheap zoloft online people with severely compromised immune systems. If you have severe buying generic amoxicillin kidney or liver problems, such as chronic kidney disease, it cialis prices will be harder for your body to remove Pemazyre from buying cheapest atrovent effects your system. Animal studies show an increased risk of congenital buy cheap retin-a anomalies (also known as birth defects) in pregnant animals given Symbicort..

The ubiquitous distribution of bits raises serious issues about children’s access to pornography, a matter we discuss in Chapter 7. As WiFi becomes available in more and more public places, it becomes harder and harder not to be confronted by the prurient interests of others who share those spaces with us. Denver airport, which offers free WiFi (hurray!), adopted a no-offensive-material policy. Who thought that airport officials would wind up in the censorship business?

But now it gets more complicated. American Airlines and other airlines are testing in-the-air WiFi, and the flight attendants’ union wants a similar no-offensive-material policy enforced — filtering the offending bits before they reach the passengers, so the attendants don’t have to adjudicate disputes between bored businessmen on their second martinis and the mothers of teenage boys sitting next to them. There is likely to be some pushback from those paying $9.95 or $12.95 for the service, especially if the filtering is too aggressive (it’s not just porn that would be filtered, apparently — “porn or other offending material,” which might cover a lot of music videos).

What people should be allowed to see is not a simple question for companies in the business of pleasing people, when people have such different views on what they and others should be allowed to see.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 16th, 2008 at 7:42 am and is filed under Censorship and free speech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.